Barely Significant
← all phrases

“a reliable trend”

89 sentences · 89 papers · 328 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.058

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a reliable trendP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
There was a reliable trend for negative correlation of serum 25(OH) D 3 with the number of exacerbations during the study period (Rho = −0.291, P = 0.055) and a significant positive correlation with FEV1% predicted (Rho = 0.728, P = 0.003) but only in patients with advanced stages.
a reliable trendp = 0.0831.7× alphagold
P3 latency data also showed a reliable trend in task x group interaction ( χ 2 (1) = 3.01, p = 0.083) and post hoc comparisons revealed P3 latency significantly differed between tasks in the NC group, indicating OA > SC P3 latency in the NC group ( mean difference = 73.1 ms, SE = 24.5, p = 0.011) which showed a large and statistically reliable effect size (Hedges’ g = 1.60, 95% CI [0.12, 1.81]), with no task differences in P3 latencies observed in the PPA group ( p = 0.525).
Reviewer #2: Major considerations • Why only the three TDHS reports were included as far as other data sets are available? or is there a specific reason for not including other available datasets? It would be helpful to explicitly mention the reason, otherwise all available dataset should be included to have a reliable trend analysis. • Factors contributing for trends of STI should be highlighted on the title as well as introduction part for consistency.
Jonckheere's trend tests on the results show a reliable trend in the inferences from the counterfactual in isolation, the counterfactual in the context of a story-without-counterexamples, and the counterfactual in the context of a story-without-if-only, for modus ponens (86%, 68% and 42%, J = 942, N = 63, p = .001), modus tollens (81%, 59%, 48%, J = 865, p = .007), affirmation of the consequent (63%, 44%, 39%, J = 815, p = .043) and the denial of the antecedent inferences (58%, 41%, 32%, J = 819, p = .036).
Causal conditionals and counterfactuals.
Acta Psychol (Amst) · 2012 · PMC3657137