Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

5,330 sentences · 5,330 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
Indeed, there was a significant trend in increasing absolute cortical thickness from sulcal to intermediate to gyral cortices (rank correlation of individual values ρ = 0.56, p < 0.01; sulcal average: 1,747 ± 112 μm; intermediate average: 1,791 ± 90 μm; and gyral average: 2,227 ± 132 μm), confirming quantitatively previous qualitative observations [ 9 ].
a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
However, among kidney transplant patients younger than 50 years at the time of transplantation ( n = 754), there was a significant trend for increasing the occurrence of post-transplant CV complications along the consecutive KDRI quartiles (χ 2 = 7.3; p < 0.01), with the frequency of CVEs across the study groups as follows: Q1 13/205, Q2 23/179, Q3 24/166, and Q4 21/123.
a significant trendP = 0.010.2× alphagold
When we grouped the patients according to their genotype and S-MBL above or below the median for their genotype (high/above [ n = 78], high/below [ n = 78], low/above [ n = 65], and low/below [ n = 66]), there was a significant trend among the four groups to predict survival free from cardiovascular event (log-rank test P = 0.01) ( Fig. 1 ).
a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
The sensitivity analysis results revealed a significant trend across UACR tertiles and ACM among participants aged <80 and with no CVD history, respectively ( p < 0.01 for trend). 3.3 ROC analysis of UACR predictive value for ACM in DM The ROC analysis results demonstrated the UACR prognostic value for ACM.
a significant trendP = 0.010.2× alphagold
Compared to Q1, the Q2 and Q4 groups showed significantly reduced risk in 1-year stroke recurrence (Q2: HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79, P = 0.005; Q4: HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81, P = 0.007), with a significant trend across all quartiles ( P = 0.01 for trend tests).
a significant trendP = .010.2× alphagold
We also found no significant interaction on the log-odds scale between PGSs and individual rCNVs, except for the 16p13.11 duplication and ADHD-PGS (β = −0.51; 95% CI, −0.86 to −0.16; P = .006), although, there was a significant trend for negative interaction coefficients (27 of 39; P = .01 in a binomial test) (eTables 11 and 12 in Supplement 2 and eTables 13 and 14 in Supplement 1 ).