Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

9,776 sentences · 9,776 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
The proportion of patients achieving full MRC score within one week also showed a significant trend among the groups (EFG group, 80%; PE group, 50%; IVIg group,12.5%, p = 0.045). the proportion of unaided walking patients in EFG group was higher than PE and IVIg group without statistically differences (80% vs. 50% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.39). the GBS-DS and INCAT scores in EFG group were slightly lower than PE and IVIg group.
a significant trendP = .04550.9× alphagold
Compared to respondents with the lowest dietary sodium residuals, there was a significant trend of decreasing odds of migraine history with increasing levels of dietary sodium residuals (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87, 1.00, P = .0455); this relationship remained after covariate adjustment (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87, 1.00, P = .0503).
a significant trendP = .0460.9× alphagold
Among both descriptive and binary questions, the median accuracy scores for easy, medium, and hard answers were 6.0 (IQR, 6.0-6.0; mean [SD] score, 5.9 [0.3]), 5.5 (IQR, 3.9-6.0; mean [SD] score, 4.8 [1.7]), and 5.8 (IQR, 5.0-6.0; mean [SD] score, 5.3 [1.1]), respectively, with a significant trend ( P = .046 determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test).
a significant trendp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Statistical tests showed that uptake was significantly greater downstream of the branch than upstream in the immature rabbits (p = 0.0024); there were no such differences for the mature and ex-breeder rabbits (p = 0.68 and p = 0.31 respectively), whereas in the >5 year old female rabbits there was a significant trend in the opposite direction (p = 0.046).
a significant trendP = .0460.9× alphagold
In contrast, only the variant homozygotes of CASP10 I522L out of all SNPs in genes involved in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway had significantly lower AC (159.49 ± 171.44) than the II homozygote (239.07 ± 205.18, P = .046) as well as a significant trend of lower AC with increasing number of the variant alleles ( P = .046).
a significant trendp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Statistical analysis of the BDAE subtests revealed a significant overall trend for improvement only for the Boston Naming Test ( t (14) = 1.82, p = 0.045) while the difference between the treated and untreated periods was nonsignificant ( t (14) = 0.27, p = 0.396) Statistical analysis of the participant's BDAE Reading subtest showed a significant trend for improvement ( t (6) = 2.00, p = 0.046), but difference was nonsignificant between the treated and untreated periods ( t (6) = 0.30, p = 0.389) Statistical analysis of the participant's Procedural Discourse task showed that there were no differences in the number of responses between the five periods There was an overall trend for improvement on the MAIN , but this did not reach significance ( t (16) = 1.37, p = 0.095), as well as between the treated and untreated periods ( t (16) = 1.24, p = 0.116).
a significant trendP =0.0470.9× alphagold
However, participants with airflow limitation had lower mean BMI compared to those without (28.4±4.8 versus 29.9±5.3, P =0.034), while a significant trend towards decreasing prevalence of airflow limitation with increasing BMI was noted (χ 2 test for linear trend, P =0.047).