“a slight significance”

Although Donors 2 and 3 showed similar trends, stiffness‐dependent patterns were less consistent: Donor 2 showed a slight significance in low (840.0 ± 399.1 μm 2 ) compared to both, mid (710.1 ± 330.7 μm 2 , p < 0.01) and high (739.7 ± 290.2 μm 2 , p < 0.01) substrates, while Donor 3 showed significant differences between low and high formulations ( p < 0.01). 3.4 Strain Characterization of Stretching Chambers Under Mechanical Loading Using DIC Custom PDMS stretching chambers with integrated stiffness were fabricated using the developed aluminum mold.

While there was a slight significance in variation with PHB:SF ratio (p = 0.0109), multiple comparisons analysis did not support any significant pairs (the lowest p-value observed was between 75:25 vs. 25:75 for 4% at p = 0.07).

Only TTSC in the M/L direction revealed a slight significance ( p = 0.016, Cohen’s d = 0.654) in the LHWS group when compared to the NS group.

carnea complex very few individuals were caught, treatments generally did not differ significantly (Table 1 ) with the exception of a slight significance of females caught by 1 mg vs. 100 mg (p = 0.019, Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni correction).

These results were confirmed in multivariate logistic analyses: multinomial analysis did not reach significance, while ordinal analysis found a slight significance ( p = 0.020) at univariate level, which remained significant ( P = 0.011) after correcting for age and gender (Fig. 5B ).

The association between UtAPI MoM T1 values and EFW percentile at T2 showed a slight significance (p = 0.028).

Afterwards, analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc test revealed no effect of the treatments on the richness in soil and only a slight significance in the root ( p ≤ 0.029).

The use of telemedicine technology reduced the effectiveness of patient care with a slight significance ( P =.03).

In the case of logistic regression, a slight significance was found when MD was included in the interaction term ( p = 0.04), but this was not observed when VFI was included ( p = 0.24).

A slight significance emerged in the distribution of gender (X 2 (1) = 4.38 p = 0.04), with more men belonging to the younger group.

After data were pooled from somatostatin trials, PEP occurred in 8.36% of controls versus 5.62% of the treated group, with a slight significance [relative risk (RR) =0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.98, P = 0.04].

A slight significance was detected as regards hypertension with p = 0.042.

The scores for PC2 show no significance with respect to sex but a slight significance with respect to age (F = −2.64, p<0.046).

10 22 24 Only a slight significance was found in our sample when comparing the capacity on the 10MWT in normal weight group with those with Z-score >+1 (p=0.046) or those with Z-score >+2 (p=0.027).

A slight significance was also obtained in the comparison of the two sexes independently of the age-groups (p = 0.048).

The variables departed from the theoretical normal distribution with a slight significance (P<0.05), and so, non-parametric tests were selected.

8(B) along with a slight significance on day 0 (p-value < 0.05), none of the other daily changes were found to be significant until day 3 of the study (p-value ≪ 0.001), which was also observed to be a slightly significant timepoint for brightness (p-value < 0.05).

On the other hand, the elastic modulus showed no significant difference between the control group and the 3 wt.% C 12 BDMA-Cl DBR, while a slight significance ( p < 0.05) was noticed by comparing the control group and the 5 wt.% C 12 BDMA-Cl DBR, as represented in Figure 2 B.

However, NS 9 showed a slight significance (p < 0.05) increase in latency time at 3 h after which the latency began to decline.

Immunotherapy showed an improved survival compared with all other therapies (Chemotherapy, Local therapy and no targeted therapy) (p=0.001) ( Figure 2A ); for Ipilimumab and combined target therapy compared with all other therapies a slight significance were observed (p=0.05) (see Figure 2B ).

There was also a slight significance, but only with p < .05 and small effect size (1%) in items 03 and 09, with the means also found to be higher in the former normality.

The culinary processes produce a slight significance (p < 0.05) in water activity (0.962–0.989) with respect to the raw algae (0.952).

Up-regulation of SDC1 also indicated a favorable prognosis in AML, but only with a slight significance (P=0.0531) ( Table 4 , Figure 3B ).

In the comparison between the reference and moderate-stable (Class 3) class, no variable was statistically significant, although male sex showed a slight significance (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.17–1.02, p = 0.054).

When analyzing caregivers' needs based on the patient's sex, a slight significance was observed in the incorrect administration of medications (10%, p = 0.054) and in the need for information on managing behavioral changes (36.7%, p = 0.008).