Although the Barthel Index [ 26 ] showed a trend close to significance ( p = 0.0545), it did not reach the conventional statistical threshold, so it is recommended to evaluate this possible pattern in studies with larger sample sizes. 4.
← all phrases
“a trend close to significance”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
When analyzing the different delays, an effect of group was detected in the 6 s delay (F 1,35 = 4.198; p < 0.05; partial η 2 = 0.107), as well as a trend close to significance in the 12 s delay (F 1,35 = 3.885; p = 0.057; partial η 2 = 0.1), but no effect was noted in the others.
A trend close to significance was found in RAVLT-I, in which ET-RBD patients performed worse (p = 0.060).
Of course, the variable left chest pain showed a trend close to significance (p=.066).
Although no statistical significance was achieved in the χ 2 test (χ2 = 2.949; P = 0.086), the Fisher exact test showed a trend close to significance ( P = 0.097).
Similarly, an increased trend of NHL mortality (+ 29%) and a trend close to significance for NHL morbidity (+ 21%) was observed among men of an Italian cohort exposed to elevated concentrations of NO x emitted from Pisa MSWI [ 51 ].
The value of MIR320A gene expression showed a trend close to significance in patients with type 2 diabetes (median: 0.045; mean: 0.144; standard deviation: 0.786) in contrast to patients with no diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (median: −0.210, mean: −0.139; standard deviation: 0.844).
A trend close to significance was also observed in the evaluation of ambulation ability (FAC).