“a trend toward significance”

Verbal agitation has a single explanatory variable with a trend toward significance: maximum HR, β = 0.492, p = .076.

However, there was a trend toward significance in the 130 mg/kg TID fosmanogepix group compared with that of the vehicle control ( P = 0.076).

The association between acromegaly and frailty showed a trend toward significance (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 0.89–10.10, p = 0.076).

A trend toward significance was present for quadriceps strength (p=0.076; Normal: 93.5±9.1%, 95% CI: 90.8-96.1; Below Normal: 88.4±7.4%, 95% CI: 83.4-93.4) but no group differences were present for hop scores (single: p=0.684; crossover: p=0.630; triple: p=0.724; 6-meter timed: p=0.341), KOS (p=0.119), or GR (p=0.136).

After adjustment for other variables in the multivariable model, this association showed a trend toward significance but did not meet the conventional threshold (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.99–1.27; p = 0.076).

In the multivariate analysis, statistical significance remained for IGF-1 (p = 0.043), while the other hormones showed a trend toward significance but with borderline p-values: PTH (p = 0.076), DHEA-S (p = 0.050), and cortisol (p = 0.062).

The median OS of VS-G in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs was longer than VS-P with a trend toward significance (P=0.076) ( Figure 2D ).

In the genotypic model (among the TT, TC, and CC genotypes), the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed that PLA2G7 rs1051931 showed a trend toward significance in the association with NRS pain scores (genotypic model, p = 0.076, Table 3 ).

While statistical significance was not achieved, our results indicate a trend toward significance (p-value = 0.076).

The distribution of Lung-RADS categories differed between black and white patients, with a trend toward significance ( p = 0.076) (Supplemental Table 2 ).

Patients who completed treatment with lurasidone had numerically larger decreases in BPRSd scores than the overall LOCF analysis sample; however, there were no significant differences from placebo for either dose group for completers at day 42, perhaps as a result of small sample size. For the PANSS total score (secondary efficacy measure), the LS mean change from baseline to week 6 (LOCF) was significantly greater in the lurasidone 120 mg/day group compared with placebo ( p = 0.009), and a trend toward significance was noted for the lurasidone 40 mg/day group ( p = 0.076) (Table 2 ).

Again, when all birds were considered individually, neither hemisphere showed a significant correlation between the quality of song imitation as measured by SI and new neuron density in NCM, although there was a trend toward significance in the left hemisphere only (n = 21; left: r 2 = 0.155, P = 0.077; right: r 2 = 0.055, P = 0.305).

Education shows a trend toward significance (p=0.077), with those holding a master's/PhD having higher means.

For the post-curriculum residents only, there was a trend toward significance between the number of near-peer didactic sessions attended and the total number of correct interpretations ( r = .248, p = .077).

Post-hoc comparison tests also confirmed a significant increase in likeability scores for China social stimuli in the OXT group in test 1 ( p = 0.02) and a trend toward significance in test 2 ( p = 0.077).

N-stage showed a trend toward significance (HR = 1.77; p = 0.077), while G-stage, tumor size, albumin, and CA19-9 were not significantly associated with overall survival ( p > 0.05 for all).

For example, there is a trend toward significance for reoperation for pseudarthrosis in the single-level TLIF versus two-level TLIF cohorts ( P = .077).

The polymorphisms rs1052133 and rs207454 show a trend toward significance in the OS analysis when the patients were ER+ ( p = 0.077 and p = 0.053, respectively) ( Figure 2A,B ).

Also, a trend toward significance (p = 0.077) is also reported in the clinical and neurophysiological domains (Empirical contribution coefficient is 0.463).

Disease remission exhibited a trend toward significance in FACT-BMT ( P = 0.077) but not in GHS ( P = 0.244).

In the IG, composed of 23 participants, the SEE‐NP overall showed a trend toward significance (pre = 3.33; post = 3.52), t (22) = −1.85, p = 0.077, with a small‐to‐moderate effect ( d = −0.37).

Although the pathological type (adenocarcinoma vs mucinous carcinoma) showed a trend toward significance ( P = 0.077), it did not reach statistical significance (Table 1 ).

A trend toward significance was also observed for quality of life across education levels ( p = 0.077), all shown in Supplemental Table 5 .

After adjusting for confounders, there was a trend toward significance in ascites culture positivity after the intervention (Supplemental Table 1 , Model 1, P = 0.077).

The PSQI showed a trend toward significance (β = 0.45, p = 0.077).