Barely Significant
← all phrases

a trend toward significance

3,329 sentences · 3,329 papers · 4,953 search hits before verification

In the literature

a trend toward significanceP = 0.0751.5× alpha
Among individuals with T2D, serum 25(OH)D concentrations were marginally associated with IL-6 (R 2 = 0.109, B = 0.076, P = 0.085) in HA with T2D, and there was a trend toward significance with log leptin (R 2 = 0.393, B = − 0.006, P = 0.075) in AA with T2D in regression analysis.
a trend toward significancep = 0.07551.5× alpha
There was no significant relationship between global ICI signal fraction ( T 5,93 = 1.353, p = 0.179 n.s.) or global ICA signal fraction ( T 5,93 = −0.298, p = 0.766 n.s.), but there was a trend toward significance with global ECI signal fraction ( T 5,93 = 1.797, p = 0.0755 n.s.) indicating that AgeAccelGrim may be signaling the presence of extracellular water in the aging brain (Figure 5a ). 3.3.
a trend toward significanceP = 0.0761.5× alpha
A trend toward significance was obtained in main effects for condition and time of ability to concentration ( F (1,15) = 3.64, P = 0.076, η p 2 = 0.20 and F (2.30, 34.46) = 3.04, P = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.17, respectively).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0761.5× alpha
A Welch’s two-sample t test of PC1 scores revealed that AHR activation showed a trend toward significance ( t = 2.68, p = 0.076), whereas no meaningful effects were observed for other pathways: AR (t = 0.48, p = 0.68), ER ( t = − 0.93, p = 0.43), and SP1 ( t = 0.37, p = 0.74) (Supplementary Fig. 4c ).
a trend toward significancep = 0.0761.5× alpha
In addition, the four-way interaction between supplement, physical exercise, BMI, and time for waist circumference showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.076, ES = 0.036), attributed to the reduction in the trained obese group and the absence of changes in the other groups.
a trend toward significancep = 0.0761.5× alpha
Patients who completed treatment with lurasidone had numerically larger decreases in BPRSd scores than the overall LOCF analysis sample; however, there were no significant differences from placebo for either dose group for completers at day 42, perhaps as a result of small sample size. For the PANSS total score (secondary efficacy measure), the LS mean change from baseline to week 6 (LOCF) was significantly greater in the lurasidone 120 mg/day group compared with placebo ( p = 0.009), and a trend toward significance was noted for the lurasidone 40 mg/day group ( p = 0.076) (Table 2 ).
a trend toward significancep=0.0761.5× alpha
A trend toward significance was present for quadriceps strength (p=0.076; Normal: 93.5±9.1%, 95% CI: 90.8-96.1; Below Normal: 88.4±7.4%, 95% CI: 83.4-93.4) but no group differences were present for hop scores (single: p=0.684; crossover: p=0.630; triple: p=0.724; 6-meter timed: p=0.341), KOS (p=0.119), or GR (p=0.136).