Barely Significant
← all phrases

an increasing trend

37,719 sentences · 37,719 papers · 105,713 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendp = 0.0320.6× alphagold
With the extension of treatment time, it showed a decreasing trend at 25 and 34 °C (Tukey’s test: 25 °C: F 2, 6 = 28.36, p = 0.001; 34 °C: F 2, 6 = 126.60, p < 0.001; Supplemental Table S1 ), a “first decreasing and then increasing” trend at 28 °C (Tukey’s test: F 2, 6 = 8.49, p = 0.018, Supplemental Table S1 ), and an increasing trend at 31 °C (Tukey’s test: F 2, 6 = 6.49, p = 0.032, Supplemental Table S1 ).
an increasing trendp = 0.0330.7× alphagold
When analyzing the approved values, there was an increasing trend in the previous period ( p = 0.033), soon after there was no significant change ( p = 0.254) and no significant change in the pattern in the later period ( p = 0.155), although apparently there is a breakpoint on the day of the disaster, which is not significant (Fig. 4 ).
an increasing trendP = 0.0350.7× alphagold
In addition, Lin et al ., observed that, among maintenance hemodialysis patients, the GSTM 1 null genotype was associated with a significantly lower antioxidant capacity than the GSTM+ genotype.[ 20 ] The null/low polymorphisms of the GSTM 1 and GSTT 1 genes have been associated with the risk of developing ESRD in North Indian patients.[ 17 ] In addition, Singh et al ., reported that patients with transplant therapy demonstrated an increasing trend toward carrying the GSTM 1 null genotype (51.3%) versus healthy controls (40.4%) with a risk of about 1.5-fold ( P = 0.035), and patients with a variant genotype of GSTM 1 were at the higher risk of transplant rejection.[ 21 ] The frequencies of important functional mutations and alleles result in broad ethnic variation.
an increasing trendP = 0.0370.7× alphagold
Among all microvascular complications, there was an increasing trend in the proportions developing impaired eGFR (3.6 vs. 3.9 vs. 6.6%, trend P = 0.037) and ESRD (0 vs. 1.5 vs. 2.3%, trend P = 0.036) among those with 0, 1, or 2 copies of the HP 2 allele, respectively.