borderline significancep = 0.056
13%) could represent a normal variant, although its borderline significance ( p = 0.056) warrants cautious interpretation.
13%) could represent a normal variant, although its borderline significance ( p = 0.056) warrants cautious interpretation.
Atelectasis showed borderline significance (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 0.98–3.78, P = 0.056) ( Figure 4B ).
History of cataract surgery and the severity of glaucoma judged by VFI showed borderline significance ( p = 0.056 and p = 0.085, respectively, Fisher’s exact test and Mann Whitney U test).
68.3 ± 0.61), a finding which reached a borderline significance ( p = 0.056).
The data illustrates that despite the absence of significant differences between the unilateral and bilateral groups, nerve invasion had borderline significance, occurring in 91.7% and 50% of cases, respectively (Table 5 ; p=0.056).
Body filling of immediate angiographic outcome showed borderline significance for major recanalization [OR, 2.06 (95% CI, 0.99 to 5.35); p =0.056].
Additionally, NPs with prior experience caring for foreign patients showed borderline significance when comparing low- and high-score groups ( p = 0.056).
However, children with PBF had a slightly higher incidence of inadequate intake of protein, compared with children without PBF, with borderline significance (4.33 ± 1.53% vs. 1.61 ± 0.65%, P = 0.056).
When data were expressed in mol%, the GB BAs’ relative values were on borderline significance ( P = 0.056) for a slight reduction in GS patients (64.5% vs. 69.4% in GSF) ( Fig. 1 , panel B1).
In multivariate analysis, all 3 polymorphisms remained significantly associated with IM, with the exception of the NQO1 609 T allele which was associated with borderline significance in the overall cohort ( P = 0.056).
Perceptions on animal welfare at slaughter were not influenced by the age of the respondent ( Table S2[b] ; Supplementary material), although there was borderline significance seen with area(s) of the slaughterhouse where issues were most encountered (χ 2 [20] = 31.0; P = 0.056).
In contrast, sucrose interventions showed a stronger and more consistent effect across two comparisons, both reporting Hedges’ g values above 0.55 and reaching borderline significance ( P = 0.056).
Analysis of association between the presence of this variant with the NrTrCr invasion profile revealed borderline significance (p = 0.056, Fisher’s exact test) suggesting that it will be necessary to analyze more isolates to confirm a significant association.
Although gender showed borderline significance (OR: 1.480, 95% CI: 0.990–2.213, p = 0.056), other variables like age group lost their significance after adjustment.
The correlation between dermal iC3b score and CD11b + cells In the Köbner-positive group, there was a correlation ( r = 0.695) with borderline significance ( P = 0.056) between the score of iC3b and CD11b + cells in 0 d biopsies, but not so in 2 h–1 d and 3–7 d biopsies.
The DD genotype alone, reaching borderline significance in the univariate analysis (42% in cases vs 31% in controls; p = 0.056) remained significant also after adjustment for conventional risk factors (p = 0.005) with a independent role on predicting events (OR 2.39 CI 1.25–4.58, p = 0.008); whereas the CYP11B2 polymorphism (CC genotype, 27% vs 17%, p = 0.054) reached borderline significance only in the crude analysis, but lost an independent role after adjustment for confounders.
This trend only showed borderline significance for DFS (HR = 2.37; 95% CI, 0.98–5.37, P = 0.056).
With the anti-thyroid regimens, the fetuin-A serum levels of the HY group decreased with borderline significance ( P = .056) (Table 1 , a vs b).
The model with the best fit was the one in which, with adjustment for age and MELD, “high” (≥31.7 kPa) SS was associated with 2.70-fold higher risk of event occurrence, with borderline significance ( P = 0.056) ( Table 3 , Model 4 for SS).
ADV revealed non-significant change in viral load when compared to LAM but borderline significance with LAM + ADV ( P = 0.056), while the association was significant with TDF, ETV and LAM + TDF.
KPS (HR = 0.932, CI [0.884; 0.990], p = 0.020) and bone metastases as the SBRT treating site (HR = 0.225, CI [0.065; 0.775], p = 0.018; Figure 3C ) appeared to be significant favorable prognostic factors in univariate analysis ( Table 4 ), with the overall number of one metastasis at borderline significance level (HR = 0.371, CI [0.134; 1.025], p = 0.056).
A comparison of selected parameters and comorbidities between DALDL and non-DALDL patients revealed borderline significance in length of stay ( p = 0.056) and a statistically significant difference in sex distribution.
In multivariate analysis for high-grade prostate cancer, there was no significant association for patients older than 60 years, whereas the DM+PC group showed borderline significance regarding the risk of high-grade prostate cancer detection for younger men (OR 5.019, P = 0.056).
Cleft-sidedness When left-sided clefts were compared to right-sided clefts, our results suggest that the total MHB score was more positive in left-sided clefts, with borderline significance ( P = .056).
Additionally, there was a tendency for patients with LVH to have higher occurrences of bothersome nocturia with a borderline significance (69.4% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.056) (Table 2 ).