“borderline significant”

For the angina frequency domain, the difference was borderline significant (59.2% vs. 53.4%, P = 0.054).

Belonging to a household with a Muslim head was associated with a 51.63% lower likelihood of receiving PZQ than belonging to a household with a Christian head (this was borderline significant; P = .054).

It was detected a borderline significant difference in control's systolic pressure ( P = 0.054) and also in MetS group's BMI, waist and TC in those with 2548G/A genotypes (0.05 < P < 0.08).

Group 3 (hazard ratio = 1.48, 95% CI 1.05–2.09, p = 0.027) and stage (hazard ratio = 1.98, p = 1.2 × 10 –5 ) remained independent predictors of poor prognosis, although MSI was a borderline significant indicator of good prognosis (hazard ratio = 0.59, p = 0.054).

In this case, we again observed a significant difference only for the subscale Word List Recall ( p = 0.039) and a borderline significant difference for the Modified BNT ( p = 0.054).

Physical activity (PA) level showed a borderline significant association with ASCVD risk (χ 2 = 5.84, p = 0.054).

When analysing the 97 couples with moderate support for transmission, the couple effect (which tests whether viral load set-points are similar within couples, see Methods ) was found to be borderline significant ( p = 0.054) by single factor ANOVA.

A borderline significant difference in OS was observed in favour of the CCRT-AC group (HR, 0.648, 95% CI 0.414–1.012; P = 0.054) ( Figure 4B ), though no significant difference in DMFS was found between the two groups before and after PSM ( Figure 4C and D ).

The interaction between work status and number of dependants for depressive symptoms was borderline significant [F(9,466) = 800.9, p = 0.054,, η p 2 = 0.035 ].

On multivariate analysis, the number of rest days remained significantly associated with seeing a doctor (OR 1.8, 95%CI: 1.1–3.1, p = 0.020), while the association with fever was borderline significant (OR 2.1, 95%CI: 1.0–4.6, p = 0.054).

The cumulative recurrence rate was lower in the EDAT group, with a borderline significant difference (log-rank test, P = 0.054).

= 0.87, p = 0.04) and borderline significant at 12 months (Coeff. = 0.81, p = 0.054).

This difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.054), indicating a potential trend towards higher seropositivity among previously diagnosed individuals.

However, the Chi-square test for gender versus discomfort saw only a borderline significant P = 0.054.

Women showed a borderline significant correlation ( p = 0.054), while men did not show a significant correlation ( p = 0.32) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.2.

Additionally, after adding the ETMCQ subscales to the mode, lower age ( β = .43, p = .012) was also a statistically significant predictor and lower depression levels at baseline were borderline significant ( β = .35, p = .054).

The distribution of MBG was borderline significant in favor of patients randomized to the pro-UK and tirofiban groups ( P = 0.054).

Between-group mean FA difference was borderline significant ( t = 1.973, P = .054), suggesting disruption of white matter integrity in patients.

( 2023 ), a significant reduction on the ‘eating concern’ subscale PEDE‐Q was reported, with a borderline significant change in global score ( p = 0.054).

Similarly, Tregs and HRV measurements in control individuals were negatively correlated with RMSSD ( P value = 0.034) and showed a borderline significant negative correlation with SDNN ( P value = 0.054).

Additionally, there was a borderline significant difference between healthcare professionals and administrators in the importance of not having sufficient staff (3.69 vs. 2.52; p = 0.054).

In the T3 group, there was a borderline significant difference in the survival time between patients with PTB High (21.2 months) and PTB Low (39.8 months; p = 0.054).

The pneumonia odds ratio of IPTW adjusted with the same confounders of 6B.2 over 6B.1 patients in northern Taiwan was still borderline significant (odds ratio: 2.569, 95% CI: 1.026–7.12, P = 0.054) ( Supplementary Table S9 ).

However, this result is only borderline significant ( p = 0.054).

The systemic immune-inflammation index emerged as a significant risk factor (OR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.003–1.012, P = .002), indicating that each unit increase in SII was associated with a 1.008% increase in cognitive impairment risk.Among the evaluated inflammatory indices, the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) exhibited a borderline significant association with cognitive impairment (OR: 0.651, 95% CI: 0.421–1.008, P = .054), suggesting a potential, albeit nonsignificant, protective trend (Table 4 ). 3.4.