“borderline significant”

Still, there was a borderline significant difference between the groups vis-à-vis educational attainment ( P =0.05).

In addition to promoting bacterial killing, treatment with 30 mM NAC visibly killed bacteria and disrupted the biofilm matrix, resulting in a borderline significant enhancement of dead biomass by 50 % (p = 0.05) ( Fig. 4 B–F).

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

However, this reduction was borderline significant in the group with more than 12 sessions ( P =0.05).

After further adjustment for age, only a smaller putamen volume fraction remained borderline significant with an OR of 0.699 ([95% CI 0.481, 0.987], p = 0.050). 3.3.

A borderline significant difference in age was observed among the groups ( p = 0.05), with post-hoc analysis revealing that patients in the Myopi-X lenses group were significantly younger than those in the single vision lenses group ( p = 0.01) and the atropine 0.01% group ( p = 0.004).

After accounting for competing mortality, there were borderline significant differences observed across the group of PGS _ FNBMD ldpred for MOF (p = 0.05), but not for HF (p = 0.71).

Rumination was a borderline significant mediator (β = −0.04, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.08, 0.00]).

However, the sex interaction P -values were only borderline significant ( P = 0.05–0.11) due to lack of statistical power, except for AF-PRS post-PCI ( P = 0.003).

Age was also found to be a borderline significant factor (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89–1.01, P = 0.05), with younger patients tending to show greater improvement in fibrosis markers and grades.

The meta-analysis revealed a slightly higher risk of delirium in male patients compared to female patients, although the difference was borderline significant (risk ratio [RR] = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.26, p = 0.050).

Regression analysis The univariable linear regression tests between AUC of post-meal SBP and age, BMI, sex, supine SBP, sinus arrhythmia ratio, the index ∆HR/∆BP and HR during phase IV of VM did not show any significant association, Table 3 ; however, the diagnosis (MSA or PD) had a borderline significant association with AUC of post-meal SBP ( P = 0.05).

Our analysis demonstrated a 32% reduction in sudden cardiac death risk (RR: 0.68 [0.49–0.93], p = 0.02), which closely aligns with Liao et al.’s borderline significant finding of a 33% reduction (RR: 0.67 [0.44–1.01], p = 0.05).

These differences in treatment effects were borderline significant (p = 0.05) (Fig. 3 E, F).

There was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) comparing the COVID >180 days group with the No COVID group.

A borderline significant association remained after controlling for differences in age category, sex, and site location (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% CI [1.00, 2.88], p = 0.05).

Calibration assessment using logistic regression showed borderline significant underprediction of the true probabilities of non-arterial sample type overall (intercept = 0.31, p = 0.05), with mild underconfidence in predictions (slope 1.24, p < 0.01).

The effect of loneliness on physical activity was borderline significant in the actively isolated group ( p = 0.050).

A linear mixed effects model fitted to stimulus value ratings (i.e., how much participants wanted to eat the food items) found a main effect of group ( ß = 0.10, SE = 0.03, p = 0.003, 95% CI [0.03–0.16]), controlled for BMI, which had a borderline significant effect on stimulus value ratings ( ß = 0.01, SE = 0.006 p = 0.05, 95% CI [−0.0002 to 0.02]).

After parental time with the child was added to model 2, its overall explanatory power had been increased to 2.2% ( p > 0.05), parental time with the child had a borderline significant impact on PCDI- comprehension ( β = 0.094, p = 0.05).

Multiple logistic regression analysis of the remaining predictors, including anti-dsDNA, C4, ESR, and clinically detected synovitis, showed clinically detected synovitis had the most significant association with and the highest odds of US-detected inflammatory arthritis in the final model (aOR = 142.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.55–3093.96; p = 0.002), as well as a borderline significant association with ESR levels (aOR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.08; p = 0.05).

Body weight: There was a borderline significant difference in BW‐kg change between study arms ( P = 0.05).

Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05, with P values for borderline significant results approaching P = 0.05 also reported.

The interaction between Immunescore and ProliferativeIndex was borderline significant in univariable analysis of the ER-positive subset (HR 0.68, CI 95% 0.46–1.0, p = 0.050) and significant in analysis of all tumors (HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.47–0.84, p = 0.001), Supplementary Data S4 .

However, the composite outcome of death or BPD was only borderline significant (40.0% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.05), and mortality alone was numerically higher in the budesonide group (16.9% vs. 13.6%, RR 1.24), although not statistically significant [ 40 ].