“borderline significant”

There were no significant differences in demographic variables and cognitive assessment scores between the groups, except for a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.05) in the MOCA score (Supplementary Table 1 ).

Importantly, the Charlson Comorbidity Index showed a borderline significant association with longer antibiotic duration (β = 4.57, 95% CI: −0.05 to 9.20, p = 0.05). 3.6.

Treatment protocols revealed a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05).

A borderline significant relationship was found between LSM and age ( r = .34; P = .05).

Associations Between Histological Parameters and OVT on Broiler Level On broiler level, a linear mixed model revealed a significant association between the OVT concentration and the villus length ( P = 0.044) and a borderline significant association between the OVT concentration and the villus-to-crypt ratio ( P = 0.050) ( Figure 3 ).

While building the multivariable predictive model for SD, we found that diabetes was borderline significant with a negative association ( p = 0.05), even though it was not significant in univariable comparisons ( p = 0.94).

Despite the limited number of animals that could be tested in these experimental settings, this finding was borderline significant (Fisher exact test; p = 0.05).

Excluding this study reduced I 2 to 0% in the desloratadine subgroup, where the effect became borderline significant ( p = 0.05; MD 5.04, 95% CI –0.05 to 10.12), and yielded a significant overall benefit in favor of the combination therapy with low heterogeneity ( p = 0.005; MD 6.71, 95% CI 2.03 to 11.39; I 2 = 12%).

After accounting for competing mortality, there were borderline significant differences observed across the group of PGS _ FNBMD ldpred for MOF (p = 0.05), but not for HF (p = 0.71).

There was a significant fibrosis‐adjusted treatment effect for TPIP vs placebo of 3.8% (P = 0.02) onBV5A‐PR and a borderline significant fibrosis‐adjusted treatment effect for TPIP vs placebo of 6.4% (P = 0.05) onBV5A‐PRA.

However, catecholamine status at the ET was borderline significant for OS ( P = .05; Fig 3 J).

Although there was a tendency for Lactobacillus populations to increase after chitosan supplementation, the mean change in the amount of this microbial agent in the chitosan versus placebo group was estimated as borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

Conversely, borderline significant differences were observed in WBC count on day3, day5, and day7 after CC ( P < 0.05) except for day1.

The difference in median score was borderline significant between CUBBITT and the reference text (p-value = 0.05), whereas it was statistically significant between CUBBITT and DeepL (p-value = 0.03), and between CUBBITT and Google Translate (p-value = 0.001).

Rumination was a borderline significant mediator (β = −0.04, p < 0.05, 95% CI [−0.08, 0.00]).

FGA rs6050 genotypes were similarly distributed in the whole cases and controls, reaching borderline significant results by comparing the allele frequency in the RPL subgroup (OR = 0.58; 0.33–1.0; P = 0.05).

Linear modelling Among the selected predictors, the number of long term time series, population density, sustainable development index, and the number of tourists were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.05), whereas country growth and Trompenaar’s 7th dimension were borderline significant ( p = 0.05–0.06; Supplement 4).

The intergroup comparison revealed that compared with the usual care group, the pad usage in the true-auriculotherapy group was significantly decreased ( P = 0.023), and the average 24 h UI episodes in the true-auriculotherapy group had a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.050).

Age was a borderline significant predictor ( p = 0.05).

A meta-analysis confirmed that whey protein supplementation for at least four weeks reduced both waist circumference ( p = 0.03, I 2 : 77%, P heterogeneity : 0.00) and body fat mass ( p = 0.04, I 2 : 00.0%, P heterogeneity : 0.44) with statistical significance, followed by borderline significance in BMI decrement (statistically borderline significant ( p = 0.05, I 2 : 23%, P heterogeneity : 0.16)), while preserving lean body mass, since no statistically significant changes in lean body mass were observed between the pre-and post-intervention data.

Multivariate analysis revealed the M1c stage to be an independent predictive factor in relation to the objective response ( p = 0.046), while a low CALLY index was a borderline significant predictive factor ( p = 0.050).

VAS-based appetite ratings did not show significant changes in hunger, fullness, or desire to eat, but a borderline significant reduction was observed in prospective food consumption after pelemir-enriched bread ( p = 0.050).

Our analysis demonstrated a 32% reduction in sudden cardiac death risk (RR: 0.68 [0.49–0.93], p = 0.02), which closely aligns with Liao et al.’s borderline significant finding of a 33% reduction (RR: 0.67 [0.44–1.01], p = 0.05).

Lastly, the authors also observed a borderline significant increase in median IBD-Q in the low-FODMAP diet group ( p = 0.05) with no change in the standard diet group [ 50 ].

The results indicated a borderline significant association between RA and the occurrence of MI within six months, with a pooled RR of 1.31 (95% CI 1.00–1.72, p = 0.05), along with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 22.3%, p = 0.26).