“borderline significant”

In exploring sources of heterogeneity using univariate meta regression, sex demonstrated a borderline significant effect (β = 0.27, P = 0.05), suggesting it may partially account for variation across studies.

When stratified by study designs, RCTs showed a significant effect in favor of MIS (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.00–1.51; I 2 = 77%); however, the difference is borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

The main result for the primary outcome is borderline significant (RR=0.85 [0.72-1.00], p=0.05), it is difficult to interpret this result.

Correlations of hypoglycemic events and overall glucose control We observed a negative correlation between eHbA1c and total daily and mild hypoglycemic events (r=−0.57 and r=−0.66, respectively, p<0.0001), while for serious hypoglycemic events there was a borderline significant correlation (r=−0.13, p=0.05) ( figure 3 ).

The MI group had a greater proportion of smokers (68.75%) compared to the control group (50.00%), with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.050).

FICB demonstrated a borderline significant increase in the risk of quadriceps weakness (RR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.02 to 10.37, P = 0.05).

There was a significant decrease in the reporting of neonatal sepsis ( p = 0.01) in the bivariate analysis, which remained only borderline significant in the multivariate model ( p = 0.05).

Further subgroup analyses based on outcome categories indicated that the pooled effect sizes of sensory stimulation were significant for continuous data for swallowing measurements ( n = 14, SMD [95% CI] = 0.75 [0.27, 1.23], p < 0.01; I 2 = 76%) (Figure 5 ) and borderline significant for dichotomous data for readiness for decannulation ( n = 3, OR [95% CI] = 6.47 [1.10, 38.04]; p = 0.05; I 2 = 3%) (Figure 6 ). 3.6.

The comparison between ‘middle’ and ‘slower’ durations was borderline significant (Mean Difference = 4.46, t = 2.39, p = 0.05), while no significant difference was found between ‘faster’ and ‘middle’ durations (Mean Difference = 1.79, t = 1.35, p = 0.19).

This score showed a borderline significant difference between patients with AFVD (mean ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.12) and controls ( P = 0.05).

Similarly, we found a borderline significant association between psychological ULL scores and DASH scores ( p = 0.05), but not with ΔVolume ( Figures 1 E,H, respectively).

In the Gem treated group of patients, TNM stage and DPD expression levels were both independent parameters for survival (with P=0.018 and P=0.036, respectively), whereas sex was borderline significant (P=0.050, Table III ).

no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).

A borderline significant difference was found in blast percentage ( p = 0.05), with more patients in the WT1 high group having blast counts ≥80%.

The two nutrients that did not show significant linear trends had relatively low variance in that nutrient among cereals and were borderline significant (fat, p = 0.05) or had relatively few respondents that considered that nutrient (iron, n = 39).

The USG spot samples (morning: 1.018 [1.008—1.028] and afternoon: 1.011 [1.000–1.026]) were borderline significant with p = 0.05).

In terms of disease severity based on symptom score, there was a borderline significant correlation between tryptase level and symptom score ( r = 0.30, p = 0.05).

Higher dietary OBS was associated with a lower prevalence of stroke ( p for trend = 0.014), although there was a borderline significant negative correlation between dietary OBS at Q4 and stroke (OR 0.568, p = 0.05).

Conversely, borderline significant differences were observed in WBC count on day3, day5, and day7 after CC ( P < 0.05) except for day1.

Despite the limited number of animals that could be tested in these experimental settings, this finding was borderline significant (Fisher exact test; p = 0.05).

The multivariate analysis confirmed the effect of EGFR mutation and advanced nodal stage, which were strongly associated with brain metastases development, while age was borderline significant (p = 0.05).

The foveal SRVD demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in HM eyes (14.9 ± 7.1% vs. 17.9 ± 7.4%; p = 0.05), while more pronounced decreases were observed in both the parafovea (43.2 ± 6.4% vs. 48.1 ± 5.6%; p < 0.01) and perifovea (45.0 ± 5.0% vs. 48.1 ± 4.2%; p < 0.01) regions ( Figure 3 ).

However, the DQI-I scores showed significant variation across BMI categories ( p = 0.019), with post-hoc analysis indicating a borderline significant difference between underweight and overweight participants ( p = 0.050).

Notably, the DFT cohort demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in PPI intake versus the JI group (I 2 = 0%, OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.12-1.00, p = 0.05), with a P-value of 0.05.

Similarly, the Kaplan-Meier analysis for PON1 showed a borderline significant difference in survival (Log-rank test: χ 2 = 3.834, p = 0.050), indicating a possible trend towards poorer survival outcomes in patients with lower PON1 activity.