“borderline significant”

Remote healthcare access was a borderline significant factor (AOR 1.28; p = 0.05).

Importantly, the Charlson Comorbidity Index showed a borderline significant association with longer antibiotic duration (β = 4.57, 95% CI: −0.05 to 9.20, p = 0.05). 3.6.

In contrast, among patients who underwent surgical treatment, BB exposure was associated with a borderline significant reduction in ACM (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42–1.00; Z = 1.95; P = 0.05), although the heterogeneity within this subgroup remained high (I 2 = 98%, P < 0.00001).

Perineural invasion showed a borderline significant difference in distribution among the groups (P=0.05).

A meta-analysis confirmed that whey protein supplementation for at least four weeks reduced both waist circumference ( p = 0.03, I 2 : 77%, P heterogeneity : 0.00) and body fat mass ( p = 0.04, I 2 : 00.0%, P heterogeneity : 0.44) with statistical significance, followed by borderline significance in BMI decrement (statistically borderline significant ( p = 0.05, I 2 : 23%, P heterogeneity : 0.16)), while preserving lean body mass, since no statistically significant changes in lean body mass were observed between the pre-and post-intervention data.

In patients with EoE, we observed a moderate inverse correlation between FLIP diameter and PEESS Child Dysphagia (r=‐0.34, p=0.015) and borderline significant weak‐moderate inverse trend between FLIP diameter and PEESS Parent Dysphagia (r=‐0.27, p=0.05).

For rs743572 ( CYP17A1 ), the dominant model yielded a borderline significant association (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.00–2.45; P = 0.05), reinforcing the increased risk observed for the C allele in the main analysis.

Overall time had a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) for patients with a Q12-16 response (Table 3 , Fig. 5 ).

In the patient group, response times to addition sums that bridged a decade (M = 4431.18, SD = 4197.4) showed a borderline significant difference from those addition sums that did not bridge a decade (M = 3698.98, SD = 3765); standardized test statistic = −1.96, n = 9, p = 0.05.

Gender was found to be borderline significant in univariate analysis ( p = 0.05) but not significant in multivariate models, which is in line with our findings regarding gender 31 .

Home O 2 use was borderline significant after adjustment for these additional variables (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.99 - 3.04, P = 0.050.) Figure 1 demonstrates a Kaplan-Meir survival analysis showing a significant increase in all cause mortality in the home O 2 cohort with an overall mean (95% CI) survival time of 6.2 (5.9 - 6.5) years (P < 0.001).

Individuals randomized to receive azathioprine did not see a reduction in the need for lid surgery (OR = 0.60; 95% CI .12, 3.04; P = .54); however, a borderline significant result was observed for radiotherapy (OR = 0.17; 95% CI .03, 1.03; P = .05) with the 95% CI crossing equality (Supplementary Table 3) ( 27 ).

RT+HMB produced modest and borderline significant improvements in handgrip strength (SMD 0.24; 95% CI 0.00–0.48; p = 0.05) and moderate benefits in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores (SMD 0.54; 95% CI 0.12–0.95; p = 0.01).

One-way ANOVA revealed a borderline significant difference in evaluator ratings across Bethesda categories ( P = .05), with a small to moderate effect size (η2 = 0.09), suggesting a potential trend in consistency ratings.

One study reported that IPSS-R outperformed IPSS in predicting OS [ 44 ], with a C-index of 0.74 ( p < 0.001), and showed borderline significant superiority over WPSS ( p = 0.05), although no significant differences were found for PFS prediction.

rvention with vorapaxar as compared with placebo. PAI-2 decreased significantly in favor of vorapaxar as compared with placebo in the total study population ( p = 0.025) at late FU, essentially driven by changes in the post-MI (chronic CHD) patients ( p = 0.054), whereas vorapaxar induced a borderline significant increase ( p = 0.05) in NSTEMI (TRACER) patients during short-term therapy ( Table 6 ).

Atrial fibrillation showed a borderline significant association with the end stage (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.00–7.55, p -value = 0.050).

Nuclear MMP9 expression correlated with ACR and immune cell markers and was borderline significant for AMR ( p ≈ 0.05).

However, the interaction of sex with the association between log-transformed 3% ODI and CHD was only borderline significant ( p =0.05).

The MI group had a greater proportion of smokers (68.75%) compared to the control group (50.00%), with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.050).

Table 7 shows that the Y-BOCS total score has a significant positive predictive effect on BDI-II score ( p < 0.05), maladaptive strategies have a significant positive predictive effect on BDI-II score ( p < 0.01), and BDI-II score has a borderline significant positive predictive effect on BIS-11 total score ( p = 0.050).

For NEUTs, a borderline significant decrease was observed between points II and III ( p = 0.05).

When comparing the AUCs of MELD-Na and the ML model, we observed a statistically borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05).

7 ): Continuous aerobic exercise (5 studies, n =142) showed a borderline significant reduction (pooled SMD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.69 to-0.01; Z = 1.99, P = 0.05) with negligible heterogeneity (I2= 0%).

The treatment group effect remained borderline significant ( p = 0.050).