“borderline significant”

The INS rs689 TT genotype appeared to affect progression from single to multiple autoAb positivity in HLA-DQ8 positive participants, although, this effect was only borderline significant ( P = 0.050), and it was not observed for INS rs1004446.

The 11 men who had erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction as a plausible escitalopram side-effect had lower mean testosterone (13.8 ± 4.7 nM) and estradiol (0.084 ± 0.023 nM) than the men without the side-effects (19.6 ± 8.7 nM and 0.110 ± 0.034 nM), which was borderline significant for testosterone (Hedges' g = 0.81, t (18.9) = 2.1, p = 0.050) and significant for estradiol using Welch's tests (Hedges' g = 0.86, t (20.9) = 2.2, p = 0.039).

There is a borderline significant effect (p=0.05) of adding cold air to induce a decrease in FEV 1 in patients with asthma.

Otherwise, we examined univariate analysis results. To eliminate the impact of the borderline significant results, we considered P≤0.05 as significant (not P=0.051).

There was a negative borderline significant association between temperature and TIH risk (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56–1.00, p = 0.05).

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

Remote healthcare access was a borderline significant factor (AOR 1.28; p = 0.05).

However, the correlation was only borderline significant ( P = 0.05), and when reanalyzing the data using Pearson’s correlation (data not shown), the correlation did not reach significance ( P = 0.08).

However, the sex interaction P -values were only borderline significant ( P = 0.05–0.11) due to lack of statistical power, except for AF-PRS post-PCI ( P = 0.003).

In exploring sources of heterogeneity using univariate meta regression, sex demonstrated a borderline significant effect (β = 0.27, P = 0.05), suggesting it may partially account for variation across studies.

Regression analysis The univariable linear regression tests between AUC of post-meal SBP and age, BMI, sex, supine SBP, sinus arrhythmia ratio, the index ∆HR/∆BP and HR during phase IV of VM did not show any significant association, Table 3 ; however, the diagnosis (MSA or PD) had a borderline significant association with AUC of post-meal SBP ( P = 0.05).

VAS-based appetite ratings did not show significant changes in hunger, fullness, or desire to eat, but a borderline significant reduction was observed in prospective food consumption after pelemir-enriched bread ( p = 0.050).

Similar observations were demonstrated in the CON group, with a borderline significant ( p = 0.05) reduction in SBP of −1.4 mmHg [−2.8;0.0] and a significant ( p = 0.03) reduction in DBP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.8;−0.1], resulting in a reduction ( p = 0.01) in MAP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.6;−0.3].

The difference in median score was borderline significant between CUBBITT and the reference text (p-value = 0.05), whereas it was statistically significant between CUBBITT and DeepL (p-value = 0.03), and between CUBBITT and Google Translate (p-value = 0.001).

Philip Morris International’s representatives assisted the majority of points-of-sale implement the display ban (89.5% in Arab and 77.3% in Jewish neighborhoods), the only borderline significant difference was more points-of-sale in Arab neighborhoods being advised on how to navigate and overcome regulatory restrictions, (26.3% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.05 ) (Table 3 ).

Similarly, borderline significant differences were found across samples for aggregate scores [ F (6,1592) = 2.12, p = 0.05].

23 This meta-analysis showed that the control group exhibited a significant reduction in the plaque score at 6 months ( P < .001) and a borderline significant decrease in overall changes compared with the MI group ( P = .05).

Age was also found to be a borderline significant factor (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.89–1.01, P = 0.05), with younger patients tending to show greater improvement in fibrosis markers and grades.

However, it has to be noted that IgG4P produced in WT plants, as well as the two plant‐produced IgG1AAG, were borderline significantly lower (0.09 < P < 0.05).

Compared with palbociclib, incremental initial period costs were higher (borderline significant) for abemaciclib (incremental cost: $5,556 [95% CI: -$71 to $11,183], P = 0.05) and not statistically different for ribociclib (incremental cost: $1,769 [95% CI: -$2,602 to $6,139], P = 0.43).

Race interaction: borderline significant (overall p = 0.05).

Age showed a borderline significant link with mortality (p=0.05), suggesting a slight risk increase with age.

FGA rs6050 genotypes were similarly distributed in the whole cases and controls, reaching borderline significant results by comparing the allele frequency in the RPL subgroup (OR = 0.58; 0.33–1.0; P = 0.05).

While building the multivariable predictive model for SD, we found that diabetes was borderline significant with a negative association ( p = 0.05), even though it was not significant in univariable comparisons ( p = 0.94).

The associations with Roseburia , Alistipes , Faecalibacterium , and Staphylococcus remained borderline significant in sensitivity analyses for SES factors ( p > 0.05) (Table S13 ).