“borderline significant”

ITT Eradication Rates Meta‐analysis of 8 trials (2502 patients: 1318 tailored; 1184 concomitant) showed a borderline significant difference favoring tailored therapy (RR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00–1.10; p = 0.05; I 2 = 58%) (Figure 2 ).

Quantitative analysis of CD31 + /DAPI staining in spinal cord sections revealed a borderline significant increase in vascular density in UTX −/− mice compared to UTX f/f controls (p = 0.05; S3 Fig ).

Otherwise, we examined univariate analysis results. To eliminate the impact of the borderline significant results, we considered P≤0.05 as significant (not P=0.051).

However, it has to be noted that IgG4P produced in WT plants, as well as the two plant‐produced IgG1AAG, were borderline significantly lower (0.09 < P < 0.05).

Pairwise comparisons revealed a significant difference between Alexandria and National University ( p = 0.001) and a borderline significant difference between Alexandria and Mansoura ( p = 0.05), while no significant difference was found between Mansoura and National University ( p = 0.124).

The meta-analysis demonstrated a borderline significant increase in cell viability at 24 hours compared with the control group (SMD 0.90; 95% CI−0.00 to 1.81; P =0.05) (I2 50.26%; P =0.11).

Similarly, nonparametric analyses demonstrated a borderline significant effect of role, p = .05 (see Table S-1).

However, educational level was found to be borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

23 This meta-analysis showed that the control group exhibited a significant reduction in the plaque score at 6 months ( P < .001) and a borderline significant decrease in overall changes compared with the MI group ( P = .05).

With an ICP threshold of ≥22 mmHg, logistic regression yielded an OR of 2.8 (1.4; 5.7, p = .00) for ONSDext and a borderline significant OR of 3.2 (1.0; 10.3, p = .05) for ONSDint.

Similar observations were demonstrated in the CON group, with a borderline significant ( p = 0.05) reduction in SBP of −1.4 mmHg [−2.8;0.0] and a significant ( p = 0.03) reduction in DBP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.8;−0.1], resulting in a reduction ( p = 0.01) in MAP of −1.5 mmHg [−2.6;−0.3].

The four-way interaction was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

In the Gem treated group of patients, TNM stage and DPD expression levels were both independent parameters for survival (with P=0.018 and P=0.036, respectively), whereas sex was borderline significant (P=0.050, Table III ).

Specifically, cortisol AUC 16:00-08:00 significantly decreased with T OD2 compared to T BID (20.2 [15.0-35.5] ng/mL/h at T BID vs 19.3 [11.8-24.0] ng/mL/h at T OD2 , P = .036), while cortisol AUC 16:00-04:00 showed a borderline significant reduction (13.1 [8.5-25.4] ng/mL/h at T BID vs 12.2 [8.7-14.0] ng/mL/h at T OD2 , P = .050).

For Pb, a borderline significant difference was detected ( p = 0.050), with tub gurnard showing slightly higher mean values; however, this finding is limited by the high proportion of missing Pb data (68.1%).

The INS rs689 TT genotype appeared to affect progression from single to multiple autoAb positivity in HLA-DQ8 positive participants, although, this effect was only borderline significant ( P = 0.050), and it was not observed for INS rs1004446.

However, since most patients who received thoracic RT achieved a complete or partial best response (90.5%), while the subgroup analysis of patients who responded to systemic therapy showed a borderline significant survival benefit ( p = 0.050), the beneficial effect of thoracic RT administered during first‐line treatment can reasonably be regarded as that of consolidative RT in a real‐world clinical setting [ 2 , 19 , 20 ].

In the PSM-matched cohort, the intervention group showed a higher GLIM-defined malnutrition remission rate and a lower overall complication incidence, while some secondary endpoints were weaker or borderline significant compared to the control group (all P < 0.05; see Supplementary Table S1 for full PSM-matched baseline characteristics and outcome results).

The regression analysis showed a positive association between maternal and offspring fasting glucose that was borderline significant (beta=0.18, 95% CI [-0.00027, 0.37], p=0.050).

There was a negative borderline significant association between temperature and TIH risk (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56–1.00, p = 0.05).

The primary endpoint, a reduction in DGF from 26.5 to 20.8%, was only borderline significant ( p = 0.05) when one-sided statistical tests were used in the analysis.

BUN was borderline significant (β = 3.5, p = 0.05).

In addition to promoting bacterial killing, treatment with 30 mM NAC visibly killed bacteria and disrupted the biofilm matrix, resulting in a borderline significant enhancement of dead biomass by 50 % (p = 0.05) ( Fig. 4 B–F).

According to the analysis: Structure: C (2.32) > B (2.21) > A (1.98)— p = .044*, Activity: C (0.91) > A (0.49)— p = .068 (borderline significant), Freedom: C/B (2.13) > A (1.84)— p > .05, Other Factors: No significant difference between groups in Privacy, Emotional Feedback, Support, and Social Interaction ( p > .05).

Female students showed a borderline significant, higher likelihood of appropriate knowledge compared with male students (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.999–2.65; p = 0.050), while age group was not significantly associated with knowledge ( Table 6 ).