Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significant

10,338 sentences · 10,338 papers · 13,764 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantP ≥ 0.051.0× alphagold
Our results showed a significant excess of nonsynonymous variants ( P = 0.047) in the Kinh population from Vietnam and a borderline significant excess of amino acid variation (0.1 ≥ P ≥ 0.05) in other populations of African (African Americans and the Mende), South Asian (Bengali, Gujarati, Telugu, Punjabi and Sri Lankan Tamil), European (Finnish, Great British, and Iberian), and East Asian (Dai and southern Han Chinese) ancestry (Table 1 ).
borderline significantp=0.051.0× alphagold
Further, FR-QoL-29 scores were significantly positively correlated, though weakly, with serum albumin levels (Spearman’s rank, n=279, r s =0.13, p=0.03) and a borderline significant inverse correlation was found between FR-QoL-29 scores and age (Spearman’s rank, n=301, r s =−0.11, p=0.05) ( online supplemental figures 7 and 8 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
When all inflammation markers, significantly associated with breast cancer, were included together in the same model (model I) the risk estimates remained similar (i.e., the effects seemed to be independent of each other), but the association was only borderline significant for IL-1β (p = 0.05).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
A meta-analysis confirmed that whey protein supplementation for at least four weeks reduced both waist circumference ( p = 0.03, I 2 : 77%, P heterogeneity : 0.00) and body fat mass ( p = 0.04, I 2 : 00.0%, P heterogeneity : 0.44) with statistical significance, followed by borderline significance in BMI decrement (statistically borderline significant ( p = 0.05, I 2 : 23%, P heterogeneity : 0.16)), while preserving lean body mass, since no statistically significant changes in lean body mass were observed between the pre-and post-intervention data.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Interestingly, two of the 11 strains analyzed, TgRabbitBr1 and TgCTPr-C3 showed a significant difference between brain regions (p < .003, Kruskal Wallis test) and strain CT-1 was borderline significant (p = 0.05, Kruskal Wallis test).
borderline significantp = .051.0× alphagold
There was a borderline significant intervention effect on change in mcpm for all (c = 49.9; 95% CI (-0.4; 100.1), p = .05), and a significant effect among the girls (c = 64.7, 95% CI (5.1; 124.4), p = .03), but not for boys (c = 31.7, 95% CI (35.2; 98.6), p = .35).