“borderline significant”

After adjusting for baseline risk factors and change in lipoproteins, the positive association between anacetrapib and CEC in those with the “1” allele remained borderline significant (standard β, 0.55; P =0.05) ( P for interaction=0.08).

On average NSW-S missed 11 prompts (32%) out of the 35 sent, with the difference between all the three groups being borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Secondary Outcomes: Total and Aerobic Activity Times In phase I (Table 2 ), the unblinded and blinded groups were not significantly different in modifying their total activity times, whereas there was a borderline significant smaller decrease in aerobic time in unblinded patients (differential 8 minutes; 95% CI, 0 to 16; P =0.05).

This interaction was borderline significant (p=0.05), and was no longer significant after multiple testing correction.

Subgroup analyses focusing on terpenoids revealed a borderline significant improvement in ADAS-cog scores following supplementation (SMD = −2.20, 95% CI −4.34 to −0.06, t 5 = −2.65, p = 0.05) ( Figure 5 ), although substantial heterogeneity was observed ( I 2 = 98%, p < 0.01).

Lastly, thrombocytopenia risk was non-significant for cabazitaxel versus other taxanes (RR = 1.47, 95% CI 0.76–2.83; I 2 = 0%) but borderline significant for C25 versus C20 (RR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.00–2.89; p = 0.05) (Fig. 9 ).

There was a borderline significant four-way interaction between retention period, presence of irrelevant information, colour congruence and spatial congruence ( F (1,79) = 3.959, p = .05).

Only the between group difference in BMI was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

There was no distribution difference among the male subgroups; however, a borderline significant association on the allelic level was observed between the CHD cases and the healthy controls in the female-stratified test (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.35–1.00, P=0.05).

We found a borderline significant relationship between age and adherence, with older patients tending to have better adherence ( p = 0.05).

The association at lag 4 days was stronger for NSTEMI (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15–1.56) than for STEMI (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93–1.27), with borderline significant difference in effect estimates ( p ‐value = 0.05; Table 3 ).

The INS rs689 TT genotype appeared to affect progression from single to multiple autoAb positivity in HLA-DQ8 positive participants, although, this effect was only borderline significant ( P = 0.050), and it was not observed for INS rs1004446.

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

Although RMT also showed a trend toward improved quality of life (SMD 1.00, 95% CI 0.00-1.99; P = .05), this result was borderline significant and derived from only three studies and should therefore be interpreted cautiously.

A borderline significant (Rho=0.26; p=0.05) association was observed between the arterial and muscular expression of CDKN2A/p16 INK4a ( Suppl.

The intergroup comparison revealed that compared with the usual care group, the pad usage in the true-auriculotherapy group was significantly decreased ( P = 0.023), and the average 24 h UI episodes in the true-auriculotherapy group had a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.050).

A borderline significant negative association with rheumatologic diseases was also observed (aOR 0.77 [95% CI 0.59–1.00]; p = 0.05).

The pooled analysis of case–control studies showed a borderline significant association (pooled OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.0–3.20, P = 0.050), a result that is likely underpowered to detect a true effect.

A borderline significant difference was observed between KC and PLE eyes (45.88 ± 2.80 D vs. 44.05 ± 3.45 D , p = 0.050).

The IgAN237 score showed a significant correlation with proteinuria (ρ = 0.181, P = 0.011) and a borderline significant correlation with baseline eGFR (ρ = −0.136, P = 0.05) ( Figure 3A ).

In the patient group a significant positive correlation was found between Glutamate/Cr and GM-content (p = 0.028, R 2 = 0.52) as well as Glutamate/Cr and tNAA/Cr (p = 0.003, R 2 = 0.74), whereas tNAA/Cr and GM-content was borderline significant (p = 0.05, R 2 = 0.44).

Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze the differences in median PAI-1 serum levels between ordinal HY score groups from 1 to 4 and a borderline significant difference was found between the groups ( p = 0.05).

The LMM for the EWH-score as dependent variable revealed that a borderline significant effect for the intervention group ( P = 0.05 * ), which significantly changed across time ( P < 0.001 * ); however, the group-time interaction was statistically insignificant ( P = 0.150) (Table 4 ; Fig. 3 ).

OCT image quality differences between SCD and MCI groups were borderline significant, with patients in the MCI group showing worse image quality than their peers with SCD (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.02–1.00, p = 0.05).

However, the correlation between cPLI and outcome was borderline significant (p = 0.05): dogs with a higher concentration of cPLI were more likely to have a bad outcome, a result that encourages further studies of this relationship in a larger sample of GDV dogs.