“borderline significant”

This yielded an AUC.64 for concentration, which was borderline significant ( p =.05).

However, it is important to note that only three studies included in the analysis had high quality, which accounted for 19.01% of the weight of the aggregated meta-analysis results, and the findings in the moderate-quality studies were borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Anti-asexual stage IgG antibody levels post infection were not statistically different between infection routes SPZ Gct and BS Gct (p=0.22), and borderline significant between SPZ Control and BS Control (p=0.050).

For IL-17, a borderline significant overall difference was detected (χ 2 (4) = 9.70, p = 0.05), with a moderate-to-large ordinal effect size (ε 2 _ordinal = 0.29, 95% CI [0.15, 1.00]).

Statistical T Tests were conducted and the results show that there is a borderline significant difference between the average Weighted F1-scores of EEGNet and LSTM-EEGNet, which has t(5)=2.029; p-value=0.050 with .

Post hoc t -tests showed no difference between MDD and HC before treatment ( t (62) = −0.46, p = 0.644, Cohen’s d = 0.11), but a borderline significant difference after treatment ( t (62) = 1.99, p = 0.050, Cohen’s d = 0.51).

The test for subgroup differences was borderline significant, P = 0.05, I 2 = 0%.

Meta-analysis of this outcome indicated a borderline significant association between increased risk of treatment discontinuation and the weekly schedule (RR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.00 – 2.32, p = 0.05).

OCT image quality differences between SCD and MCI groups were borderline significant, with patients in the MCI group showing worse image quality than their peers with SCD (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.02–1.00, p = 0.05).

The overall model was borderline significant (logrank test p = 0.05), but no individual variables reached the level of significance ( Table 4 ).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

Although sex was borderline significant ( p = 0.050), it is noteworthy that all three observed deaths occurred in female patients, and the limited number of events restricts the interpretability of this finding.

Immediate graft function, higher in the stented group, became borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

For the MTRR A66G polymorphism, we detected a borderline significant interaction between this polymorphism and overweight/obesity on serum HDL-C levels ( P = 0.050, Table 3 ).

The tests reached statistical significance for all categories except for chilli sauces and stocks (as sold), and was borderline significant (p=0.05) for light soy sauces and Hoisin sauces.

Lastly, all fixed effects that proved at least borderline significant (p ≤ 0.05) were incorporated into a final LMM for FEV 1s and VC.

Acute lower respiratory symptoms were associated with lower CCL17 [estimate: 0.6 pg/ml, (95% CI: 0.5–0.8), p < 0.001] and a borderline significant lower level of CCL20 [estimate: 0.5 pg/ml (95% CI: 0.2–1.0), p = 0.05] ( Table 4 ).

There was a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05) between the median (min–max) ratios of anti-S, which seroconverted at different onsets: 3.39 (0.24–122) on day 15, 1.9 (0.5–4.5) on day 25, and 0.89 (0.45–1.11) on day 35.

Other variables did not reach statistical significance, although the occipital fat pad was borderline significant and showed a trend toward a favourable outcome (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.99–1.83, p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

There was a significant difference in the reduction of number of pupae (P = 0.04; Figure 2 ) and a borderline significant reduction of the PPI (pupae per person index) between intervention and control arms (P = 0.05; Table 2 ).

Three other glycosylated ceramides were borderline significant, showing log2 fold changes > 0.75, but unadjusted P -values < 0.05.

The relationship with optimistic/calm personality was borderline significant (p=0.050).

The HRs for the continuous PRS were not significantly different between the BCFR and kConFab study cohorts (p=0.13) for study*PRS interaction, but were borderline significant for the upper vs. lower quintile (P=0.05), nor did the HR vary significantly as a function of age at baseline (p=0.88 and p=0.71 for the two cohorts, respectively).

The spline function provided a significantly improved curve-fit in comparison to a linear function for MOF ( p = 0.01), but the improvement was only borderline significant for hip fracture ( p = 0.05).

After adjustment, the associations between FTO and baseline BMI remained borderline significant ( p = 0.050).