“borderline significant”

(2018) [ 19 ] in China reported a borderline significant association between lower annual household income and root caries in the 35–44-year-old age group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00, p = 0.05).

Multivariate analysis revealed the M1c stage to be an independent predictive factor in relation to the objective response ( p = 0.046), while a low CALLY index was a borderline significant predictive factor ( p = 0.050).

PSA was borderline significant and a positive trend was observed for the presence of atypia and age at time of the index biopsy (all P > 0.05).

Comparison of birefringence values between diabetic subjects with no clinically manifest DR versus mild to moderate DR stages revealed a borderline significant difference (0.0065 [–0.000004; 0.0130], P = 0.050; Fig. 2 ).

A comparison of stimulation protocols showed a borderline significant difference regarding CPR ( p = 0.05).

With the exception of the social functioning subscale, which indicated a borderline significant increase in the intervention group at week 12 with a score of 0 (0, 12.5) compared to the control group's −12.5 (−12.5, 12.5) ( p = 0.05), no significant differences in QOL scores were observed between the two groups during the follow‐up phase relative to the pre‐treatment phase.

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

In addition, hsCRP levels decreased after T&A (3.12±1.22 to 2.23±1.17 mg/dl ; p<0.01), but improvements in HOMA-IR were only borderline significant (2.1±0.9 to 1.7±0.8; p<0.05).

Baseline IL-6 ( Table 4 , down) showed a borderline significant positive association with attention at baseline (TMT-A: β = 0.360, p = 0.050), which persisted as a trend at 5 years (β = 0.996, p = 0.052) and reached significance at 10 years (β = 0.568, p = 0.020).

Within-group analysis showed a borderline significant improvement in the sham group ( p = 0.05) and a trend toward improvement in the real tDCS group ( p = 0.06).

This trend was reflected in our meta-analysis, which showed a borderline significant reduction in the odds of requiring mechanical ventilation in vitamin D-sufficient patients (p=0.05), further reinforcing the potential respiratory benefits of adequate vitamin D levels in this population.

However, there was a borderline significant difference in gender distribution between the clusters ( χ 2 1 =3.84; P =.05).

After adjustment, the associations between FTO and baseline BMI remained borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

The CAT algorithm derived from the nurse focus group was a borderline significant predictor of hospitalization risk (odds ratio (OR): 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–1.14; p = 0.050) in a model that also included hospitalization frequency in the previous year (OR: 3.98; 95% CI: 1.30–12.16; p = 0.016) and anticholinergic risk score (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 0.87–10.89; p = 0.081).

The comparison between ‘middle’ and ‘slower’ durations was borderline significant (Mean Difference = 4.46, t = 2.39, p = 0.05), while no significant difference was found between ‘faster’ and ‘middle’ durations (Mean Difference = 1.79, t = 1.35, p = 0.19).

Median performance scores did not differ significantly between women (4.8, IQR 3.7–6.0) and men (5.0 IQR 3.6–6.0) However, satisfaction with performance was slightly lower among women (median 3.0, IQR 2.0–4.5) than among men (median 3.5, IQR 2.3–4.7), although this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 4 ).

Overall, the prevalence of any ocular morbidity was 12% in government schools (186) and 15% in private schools (100) with a borderline significant difference ( P = 0.05; CI = 95%).

ADC presented a borderline significant discriminatory power (AUC 0.600, p = 0.05), with a significantly lower AUC compared with the SUVavg and short-axis diameter ( p < 0.01 and p = 0.03, n = 162). 3.5.

Multivariate analyses In the multivariate analyses (Table 2 ), high expression of miR-141 (TE + TS) was borderline significant for BFFS (HR = 1.07 95% CI 1.00–1.14, p = 0.050), not with CFFS (HR = 2.32 95% CI 0.94–5.73, p = 0.068).

However, there were some baseline differences (phase 0) between conditions as patients with COPD in GP practices showed a borderline significant decrease ( p = 0.050) in 2020 vs. 2019 compared to patients with asthma ( p = 0.507).

For UCDVA, a borderline significant correlation was observed with IOL decentration (r = 0.14, p = 0.05; 95% CI: 0.002–0.27), whereas tilt was not associated (r = 0.0006, p = 0.99).

Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze the differences in median PAI-1 serum levels between ordinal HY score groups from 1 to 4 and a borderline significant difference was found between the groups ( p = 0.05).

According to the analysis: Structure: C (2.32) > B (2.21) > A (1.98)— p = .044*, Activity: C (0.91) > A (0.49)— p = .068 (borderline significant), Freedom: C/B (2.13) > A (1.84)— p > .05, Other Factors: No significant difference between groups in Privacy, Emotional Feedback, Support, and Social Interaction ( p > .05).

There was a borderline significant difference in p[Na] following the intervention from baseline to visit 6 for the intervention group (p = 0.050).

Three other glycosylated ceramides were borderline significant, showing log2 fold changes > 0.75, but unadjusted P -values < 0.05.