“borderline significant”

The association at lag 4 days was stronger for NSTEMI (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.15–1.56) than for STEMI (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.93–1.27), with borderline significant difference in effect estimates ( p ‐value = 0.05; Table 3 ).

A borderline significant effect was also observed on the somatic sensory item ( p =0.05).

7 ): Continuous aerobic exercise (5 studies, n =142) showed a borderline significant reduction (pooled SMD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.69 to-0.01; Z = 1.99, P = 0.05) with negligible heterogeneity (I2= 0%).

There was also a borderline significant difference by residence, with higher HBV seroprevalence observed among urban dwellers compared to rural participants (14.9% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.050).

never use, we found significant associations for 2,4-D (p = 0.01) and butylate (p = 0.04) with shorter RTL, and a borderline significant association for aldrin and shorter RTL (p = 0.05).

Findings were borderline significant for the employed (MOR 1.4; CI: 1.0-2.0, p = 0.05) Table 3 .

Subgroup analyses focusing on terpenoids revealed a borderline significant improvement in ADAS-cog scores following supplementation (SMD = −2.20, 95% CI −4.34 to −0.06, t 5 = −2.65, p = 0.05) ( Figure 5 ), although substantial heterogeneity was observed ( I 2 = 98%, p < 0.01).

The Acinetobacter were more abundant in group A (Student’s t -test was borderline significant, p = 0.05), and the Xanthomonads were significantly more abundant in group B (Student’s t -test, p = 0.03).

When the estimated growth charts for kidney length were superimposed on the kidney lengths of normal age-matched controls drawn from Rosenbaum et al, 6 the differences in the length of the kidneys between controls and patients with BWS were borderline significant (p=0.05) for patients younger than 1 year of age and highly statistically significant (p=0.003) for patients older than 1 year of age ( Table 1 ).

Before carrying out a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, the association between use of PPI and mortality was found to be borderline significant (OR 1.12 [1.00, 1.25]; I 2 85%, p = 0.05), Figure 4 . 3.4.

After adjustment, the associations between FTO and baseline BMI remained borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

However, the composite outcome of death or BPD was only borderline significant (40.0% vs. 46.3%, p = 0.05), and mortality alone was numerically higher in the budesonide group (16.9% vs. 13.6%, RR 1.24), although not statistically significant [ 40 ].

LN metastasis showed a borderline significant tendency to dSUV ( P = .05).

At this age, there was a borderline significant difference in the E2/E1 ratio with a higher ratio in the NR group [0.76 (0.45–0.95) vs. 0.34 (0.07–0.65); P = 0.050]; however, there were no differences in the E2 concentrations between the two groups; Figures 3A,B .

OCT image quality differences between SCD and MCI groups were borderline significant, with patients in the MCI group showing worse image quality than their peers with SCD (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.02–1.00, p = 0.05).

Body weight: There was a borderline significant difference in BW‐kg change between study arms ( P = 0.05).

There was no significant difference between the four groups in the baseline condition of Schober’s test before the training programmes ( p = 0.358) and the difference was borderline significant between the four groups ( p = 0.050) after the training period.

A comparison of stimulation protocols showed a borderline significant difference regarding CPR ( p = 0.05).

When we compared trials of the same category, we found no main effect of “preceding status” ( F (1,28) < 1), a borderline significant main effect of “current status” indicating a somewhat conservative response bias (new > old ; F (1,28) = 4.20, P = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.13), and the interaction between preceding status and current status ( F (1,28) = 7.23, P < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.21) that shows the afterglow effect.

Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to analyze the differences in median PAI-1 serum levels between ordinal HY score groups from 1 to 4 and a borderline significant difference was found between the groups ( p = 0.05).

There were 6 cases where an age-related gene also had a borderline significant F-test (P<0.05).

There were also borderline significant differences between communities (adjusted r 2 = 0.02; p = 0.05).

Regression analysis The univariable linear regression tests between AUC of post-meal SBP and age, BMI, sex, supine SBP, sinus arrhythmia ratio, the index ∆HR/∆BP and HR during phase IV of VM did not show any significant association, Table 3 ; however, the diagnosis (MSA or PD) had a borderline significant association with AUC of post-meal SBP ( P = 0.05).

The comparison between ‘middle’ and ‘slower’ durations was borderline significant (Mean Difference = 4.46, t = 2.39, p = 0.05), while no significant difference was found between ‘faster’ and ‘middle’ durations (Mean Difference = 1.79, t = 1.35, p = 0.19).

In our study we showed borderline significant excess nephrotoxicity of 7.1% of the colistin group compared to tigecycline group ( P = .05) for the baseline characteristic comparable cohorts.