“borderline significant”

We saw a significant increase in child’s weight overtime for both group ( p -value = 0.023), and there was borderline significant difference in the weight change from baseline between intervention and comparison group ( p -value = 0.050).

The CAT algorithm derived from the nurse focus group was a borderline significant predictor of hospitalization risk (odds ratio (OR): 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–1.14; p = 0.050) in a model that also included hospitalization frequency in the previous year (OR: 3.98; 95% CI: 1.30–12.16; p = 0.016) and anticholinergic risk score (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 0.87–10.89; p = 0.081).

The group-by-time effect was borderline significant ( P = 0.050).

The two nutrients that did not show significant linear trends had relatively low variance in that nutrient among cereals and were borderline significant (fat, p = 0.05) or had relatively few respondents that considered that nutrient (iron, n = 39).

In the majority of analyzed STS subtypes, no significant association was found between uPARAP expression and either gender or sample origin, except in LMS, where a borderline significant correlation was observed between expression and sample origin ( p = 0.050 after Bonferroni correction), suggesting that uPARAP expression could vary depending on the sample origin of LMS.

Severity of depression showed a significant negative association with the AUCg level ( β =−0.086, s.e.=0.040, P =0.034), and the number of episodes showed a borderline significant association with CRP in women ( β =−0.067, s.e.=0.034, P =0.050).

When comparing the AUCs of MELD-Na and the ML model, we observed a statistically borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05).

The HRs for the continuous PRS were not significantly different between the BCFR and kConFab study cohorts (p=0.13) for study*PRS interaction, but were borderline significant for the upper vs. lower quintile (P=0.05), nor did the HR vary significantly as a function of age at baseline (p=0.88 and p=0.71 for the two cohorts, respectively).

As compared to 300 m altitude, training at 1,900 m showed borderline significant differences in the pre-post mean reduction rates of triglyceride (p = 0.050) and leptin levels (p = 0.093).

patient non-rehabilitation visits were higher among those with unchanged pre-frail or frail status (odds ratios [OR]: 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–3.71 and OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.04–3.79, respectively), and among those with deteriorated frailty status (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 0.97–4.18, p = 0.06 borderline significant, and OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 0.99–4.26, p = 0.05 borderline significant, respectively); but not for risks of hospital admission and emergency room visits if unchanged robust status was used as the reference group (Table 4 ).

In the whole cohort ( n = 51), the PR‐diet induced a borderline significant increase of IPA and IAA (FDR‐adjusted p ‐value: 0.10 < p < 0.05, Supplementary Figure S1 , Supporting Information).

However, when aggregating AI knowledge into tech-savvy (categories “advanced” and “good”) vs non–tech-savvy (categories “basic” and “no knowledge”), there was a borderline significant association with geographical origin (Χ 2 = 7.65, df = 3, p = 0.05), with the most notable difference among responders from Southern Italy who rated themselves as tech-savvy (Pearson-adjusted standardized residuals +1.71).

There was a borderline significant relationship between increasing VEM levels and population percentage of the Asian race (Spearman 0.125, p =0.05).

BOLD, a community-based intervention, demonstrated borderline significant decreases in perceived pain as moderate/severe (45.5% to 38.2% at post-test; p = 0.05) [ 37 ].

Female students showed a borderline significant, higher likelihood of appropriate knowledge compared with male students (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.999–2.65; p = 0.050), while age group was not significantly associated with knowledge ( Table 6 ).

Notably, L491P showed a borderline significant increase post-ART (15.8% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.05). 3.5.

Calibration assessment using logistic regression showed borderline significant underprediction of the true probabilities of non-arterial sample type overall (intercept = 0.31, p = 0.05), with mild underconfidence in predictions (slope 1.24, p < 0.01).

(2018) [ 19 ] in China reported a borderline significant association between lower annual household income and root caries in the 35–44-year-old age group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00, p = 0.05).

The long-term NATHAN 1 trial reported a marginal, borderline significant effect on the primary composite endpoint (NIS-LL, p = 0.05) without significant improvements in nerve conduction studies; therefore, evidence for functional stabilization is very limited and inconclusive.

The meta-analysis of the comparison of the means of three studies that compared NHD patients with a follow up period of 4–6 months with control patients that continued on CHD for 4–6 months showed a borderline significant increase in serum albumin in NHD patients (mean difference 1.3 g/l, 95% CI 0.02; 2.58, P = 0.05) ( Fig 2b ).

Its performance did not improve considerable within the select group of 452 patients having a pneumonectomy and lobectomy for which this score was developed, ThRCRI score was a borderline significant predictor of post-operative cardiac complications (χ 2 =8.00, degrees of freedom=3, p = 0.05).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

Significant or borderline significant ( P <0.05) baseline clinical variables from univariate results were used in the model.

A borderline significant increase was recorded in target segment revascularization with FFR in the RCA (adjusted HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.00-2.15; P = .05).

Although one study found age to be borderline significant in univariate analysis (p = 0.05), increasing age was ultimately included in their prediction model for fibrosis [ 31 ].