Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not quite reach significance”

351 sentences · 351 papers · 396 search hits before verification

In the literature

When compared to the synchronized cells, the released cells still had significantly less mature CTSB, while the reduction in LAMP1 levels did not quite reach significance ( p = 0.076) ( Figure 2 a).
Lysosomal Changes in Mitosis.
Cells · 2022 · PMC8909281
Whole gene deletions were present in 6/166 (3.6%) of familial samples with identified mutations and 15/182 (8.2%) of sporadic samples but this difference did not quite reach significance ( p = 0.08).
OS had a similar trend as PFS in these groups, that also did not quite reach significance (HR =1.618 with 95% CI of 0.937 to 2.794, P=0.08), with a post-hoc power analysis indicating 79.5% power to detect a difference in 5-year survival of this magnitude with alpha of 0.05 ( Figure 3 ).
IL-10 and IL-12 Responses after In Vitro Antigenic Stimulation of Breastfeeding Infant Leukocytes Were Correlated to Infant’s Own vitD Status Breastfeeding infant leukocyte IL-10 secretion after antigenic challenge appeared to be more closely correlated to the infant’s own vitD status ( Figure 6 A) rather than to maternal status, which did not quite reach significance ( p = 0.08; Table S1 ).
Although the difference between the Same and Reverse conditions did not quite reach significance when collapsing across stimulus, t (11) = 1.89, p = .09, the decrease in priming for the Reverse condition was significant when the analysis was restricted to Complete objects, t (11) = 1.89, p < .05, consistent with previous findings ( Dobbins et al., 2004; Schnyer et al., 2006 ).
Priming, response learning and repetition suppression.
Neuropsychologia · 2008 · PMC2430995
8 C ) and asymmetry (Fig 8 D ) also shows significant sinusoidal modulation (reduced χ 2 1.9 and 2.8 times better than the null model), accounting for 39.2% and 68.2% of the variance ( t (9) = 2.41, P = 0.04; t (9) = 4.40, P = 0.002), respectively, but the modulation of mean speed responsiveness (not shown) did not quite reach significance ( t (9) = 1.94, P = 0.09).
Fecal Propionate RS effect overall: Propionate concentrations were significantly increased in the HAMS period ( p < 0.001) and to a lesser degree in the HAMSA period ( p = 0.03) ( Table 2 , Figure 2 ), although the difference between HAMS and HAMSA did not quite reach significance ( Table 2 , p = 0.09).