Barely Significant
← all phrases

difference was apparent

199 sentences · 199 papers · 3,058 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Listed by Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

difference was apparentP = 1.39 × 10 −500.0× alphagold
This difference was apparent regardless of whether the minor allele is associated with higher (Δmean |log 2 (aFC)| = −0.277; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test: W = 928,592, P = 1.39 × 10 −50 ) or lower expression (Δmean |log 2 (aFC) = −0.268; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test: W = 967,228, P = 2.97 × 10 −47 ), consistent with a model of stabilizing selection whereby gene expression is maintained within an optimal range.
difference was apparentp = .0010.0× alphagold
While no difference was observed between the LVF ( M = 0.01 ± 0.01) and RVF ( M = 0.002 ± 0.01) for incongruent trials, t (46) = −0.72, p = .956, d = −0.10, a difference was apparent for congruent trials such that the dual-task cost in the RVF ( M = 0.11 ± 0.02) was greater than in the LVF ( M = 0.03 ± 0.01), t (46) = 3.71, p = .001, d = 0.54.
Lateralized costs of divided attention to faces.
Atten Percept Psychophys · 2025 · PMC12745327
difference was apparentp=0.0100.2× alphagold
Results: Over the intervention phase (an aggregate score including all post-allocation timepoints to day-five) a group difference was apparent in favour of WoB for NA (WoB-Ash n=448, NA -0.158, p=0.010) but no differences were detected for PA or K10 and differences were not detected at week six.
difference was apparentp = 0.010.2× alphagold
In contrast, a significant difference was apparent between breeds in their ability to discriminate object location (F 1,16 = 9.20; p = 0.01) and in post-hoc testing, the DRs of Wistar rats was significantly different from zero (t 7 = 4.23, p < 0.01), while the DRs of GK rats was not (t 9 = 1.94, p = 0.08).
Altered pattern separation in Goto-Kakizaki rats.
Curr Res Neurobiol · 2023 · PMC10313866
difference was apparentp=0.0100.2× alphagold
Quantitative results are described in more detail elsewhere, 27 but in brief over the intervention phase (an aggregate score including all postallocation timepoints to day 5), a group difference was apparent in favour of WoB for negative affect (WoB-Ash n=448, NA −0.158, p=0.010), but no differences were detected for positive affect or psychological distress and differences were not detected at week 6.
difference was apparentP = 0.020.4× alphagold
Sex differences A significant sex difference was apparent in the rate of progression of cognitive decline as measured by CDR‐SB in untreated NACC AD participants ( P = 0.02) with females associated with more rapid cognitive decline compared to males (Figure 3A , dashed lines).