“difference was apparent”

In the yeast halo formation assay, one qualitative difference was apparent between the p-gpa1-M362I and the p-GPA1 strains, regardless of their RGS status.

SAKT was elevated after exposure of PB-treated rats to 40,000 ppm VC, but no fed-fasted difference was apparent.

The difference was apparent after one day of stimulation, and did not increase over time, consistent with a greater initial induction of proliferation of IL-4-producing cells in the presence of anti-CD81.

This difference was apparent when there were 0, 1 or 10 gj-channels at the cell junctions.

Our present experience with the SVRMHC models indicated that no significant difference was apparent among the three alignment protocols.

The HTLV-I group had slightly lower mean FVC, FEV 1 and DLCO corr than did the seronegative group, but no such difference was apparent for the HTLV-II group.

In contrast, when the peak information during the response to the calls was compared between sites for mothers and naïve females (peak between 5–70 ms after call onset, an interval equal to the longest call duration) (solid magenta and sage lines in Figure 8 , respectively), a clear difference was apparent.

This difference was apparent for all three quinquennia and is therefore not due to increasing centralisation of care - Figure 2.

The dose to this skin area had only been about 2000r when the smaller fields were substituted. No difference in reaction or tumour response in the two areas was apparent at this stage. On October 6, as viable tumour was still feared to be present, further treat- ment was given as described. Three weeks after the conclusion of treatment a marked difference was apparent between the two areas.

The sex difference was not significant with the lower tumour dose. Closed colony mice.-As with the C3H mice the survival time was greater with the lower tumour dose, the difference being approximately 12 days (0.001 > P). No sex difference was apparent.

This difference was apparent only when low doses of oells were used.

The inclusion of age-matched GP controls provided a reference population against which to compare these factors. A striking and highly significant difference was apparent between counselled women and the GP control group in terms of cancer-specific distress, suggesting that high-risk women experience breast cancer-related worries that are not assuaged by genetic counselling.

This difference was apparent regardless of the initial dose of virus, as increasing the inoculum of LCMV Armstrong from 10 5 PFU to 2 × 10 6 PFU resulted in comparable kinetics of IL-10 secretion (unpublished data).

This difference was apparent at early stages of somite development among the small number of Myf-5/ and myogenin/ cells in the three or four most caudal of the MRF-expressing somites.

In particular, a large difference was apparent between the RNA and DNA G4 tetraplex substrates.

This difference was apparent by P11 and persisted into adulthood.

No striking difference was apparent in the distribution of the sulfur-35 in the tissues of the pregnant and non-pregnant rats.

There was no size difference between the 35 K molecules made by thymocytes of Lyt 2.1 and Lyt 2.2 genotypes, but a charge difference was apparent.

A more pronounced difference was apparent in the distribution of the Ly-49D activation receptor with Ly-49H.

A significant difference was apparent even between the 1st and 3rd residues in this larger selection (Figure 16 ).

In both BM→ Tgε26 and CD45RB hi → Scid RAG null animals little difference was apparent between the overall gross disease in each group of mice (Fig. 5 ).

The difference was apparent in subjects from whom blood was collected several years before the diagnosis of the cancer, indicating that the low beta-carotene levels in the cancer subjects were unlikely to have been simply a consequence of pre-clinical disease.

This difference was apparent at early time points, being most obvious at PN day 7 with a greater than twofold difference in the EGL thickness of infected animals as compared with control animals ( Fig. 5 B ).

No significant difference was apparent in the plasma levels of cortisol among the three groups.

Encouragingly, no significant difference was apparent between the weight-loss observed in mice receiving only ZD1839 and those receiving the combined treatment ( Table 1 ).