“extremely significant”

Significance was indicated as: ns, not significant (p > 0.05); *, significant (p < values 0.05); **, very significant (p < 0.01); and ***, extremely significant (p < 0.001).

Repeated-measures ANOVA reported an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.0014).

The NF group showed extremely significant performance improvements in the backward digit span task after NF training (t = −4.283, p = 0.002) but did not show statistical significance in the Sham-NF group (t = −2.242, p = 0.052).

In this instance, a one-sample t -test was extremely significant ( T = 3.58, df = 11, p = 0.002).

They found 145 popliteal cysts in 382 knees (38%) and that there was extremely significant association between knee joint effusion and popliteal cyst ( P = 0.002).

Analysis of effects of N/DTV (V), seed type (S), different wavelength of light (L) and their interactions on seed germination showed that, except for interaction of V × S × L, all effects were extremely significant difference ( P = 0.003 or P < 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

Surprisingly, mice that received only a twice-greater dose (10 μCi) demonstrated greatly decreased tumor growth inhibition, and the tumor volume difference between mice receiving the 5 μCi versus the 10 μCi dose became extremely significant over the ensuing two weeks ( P <0.004).

Specifically, the comparison with the SPEA method shows extremely significant differences on the COBRE, Nottingham, and Xiangya datasets ( p < 0.005), and the comparison with PSO-MET has p values less than 0.025 on all datasets, indicating that the differences are highly statistically significant.

Some extremely significant heritability (h2_observed_ p < 0.005, Genetic Correlation Z-score >10.00) were confirmed, including sleep duration (h2_observed_ p = 7.96 × 10 −26 , Genetic Correlation Z-score = 10.51) and chronotype (h2_observed_ p = 1.06 × 10 −52 , Genetic Correlation Z-score = 15.28).

Time matching within reciprocated grooming bouts Analyses of all reciprocated grooming bouts suggested that the relationship between the amount of time each initiator spent grooming the recipient and the amount of time the receiver reciprocated was extremely significant (weighted least-squares regression analysis, F 1,102 = 7.91, p = 0.0059).

The statistical strength of the relationship between number of spike/m2 of broomrape and the reduction in various faba bean yield and yield components traits (R2>0.5 in all cases, most exceeding 0.85), extremely significant p-values ( p ≤ 0.008), and biological plausibility combine to prove that broomrape spike density is a primary determinant of yield reduction in faba bean, primarily through its impact on pod number.

There was no significant difference between the gE-M-Z, gE-M-P, and Shingrix groups ( p = 0.07 and p = 0.22, respectively), and there was an extremely significant difference between the gE-M-P and Shingrix groups ( p = 0.009, **).

Differences were assumed to be extremely significant (***) if the probability ( p ) value was <0.001, very significant (**) if p < 0.01, significant (*) if p < 0.05, and not significant (N.S.) if p ≥ 0.05.

An extremely significant difference was observed between the group receiving free Ptx and the group receiving Ptx nanoparticles ( P < 0.01) or Ptx/Tet nanoparticles ( P < 0.01).

Irrigation methods showed extremely significant effect on the total GWP and yield-scaled GWP ( P < 0.01), while fertilization regimes had no effect on both. 4.

The differences of the 18 differentially expressed miRNAs all reached the extremely significant level (P<0.01) (Fig. 2 ).

There were ten extremely significant enrichment pathways from stage II to III (p<0.01): such as glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, pentose phosphate pathway and fructose and mannose metabolism.

No between-group BW differences were noted in the 80-day-old Hu sheep; however, in the 180-day-old Hu sheep, the diseased group demonstrated a extremely significant decrease in BW compared with the healthy group ( p < 0.01); the live weight before slaughter and carcass weight were also significantly lower than those in the healthy group (both p < 0.01).

Among them, the TGF-beta signaling pathway was extremely significant ( P < 0.01, Fig. 4 B and Table S7 ), which was closely related to cell proliferation and differentiation.

The COD Mn , COD, Chl a, TP, TN, and NO 3 -N levels at Taizishan were higher than those at other monitoring sites, and the differences in COD Mn , TN, NO 3 -N and Chl a were significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Table 1 ).

The values were considered to be significant when p < 0.05 and extremely significant when p < 0.01.

Statistical significance is considered to be extremely significant if p<0.01, significant if p<0.05, and to have a trend towards statistical significance if 0.05<p<0.1.

The quadratic terms (A2, B2, and C2) all have extremely significant effects ( p < 0.01); according to the F and p values [ 20 ], the degree of impact on the total flavonoid yield in Perilla leaves can be determined as follows: liquid–solid ratio (A) > ultrasonic temperature (C) > ethanol volume fraction (B).

In this study, uppercase letters indicate an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01), and lowercase letters indicate a significant difference ( p < 0.05). 3.

Germination Test and Seedling Growth Test According to a comparative analysis of the physiological indices of ten seeds from the 24 maize hybrid seed lots of eight cultivars, the indices of three seed lots of the same cultivar all exhibited the same trend in change: 2023 seed lot > 2022 seed lot > 2021 seed lot; the differences in the vigour indices (such as the GI and VI) among the three seed lots of the same cultivar were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01).