“extremely significant”

Differences were considered significant when p < .05(*), and very significant when p ≤ 0.01(**), and extremely significant when p ≤ 0,001(***).

The regression coefficients for both equations were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

There were extremely significant differences between the Li and Han groups in the mother’s lifestyle and the use of intrapartum antibiotics (Chi-square, both p = 0.001).

The difference in PD - L1 expression level between the two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

It was extremely significant ( p < 0.001) in PD1–PD11 and ( p < 0.01) and was not significant in PD15–PD21 when compared to control.

PERMANOVA analysis revealed extremely significant differences between fallen leaf and fecal bacterial communities (F = 13.47, R 2 = 0.53, p < 0.001).

Differences between values were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 (*), very significant at p<0.01 (**) and extremely significant at p<0.001 (***).

Significance values were set as follows: nonsignificant: ns P > 0.05; significant: * P ≤ 0.05; very significant: ** P ≤ 0.01; and extremely significant: *** P ≤ 0.001; **** P ≤ 0.0001.

It could be discovered that the coefficients of X 3 were extremely significant ( p < 0.001), and the coefficients of X 1 , X 1 X 2 , and X 3 2 were found to be significant ( p < 0.05) as well.

The dyed fabrics with different (SDs) synthesized dyes exhibited an extremely significant differences in K/S values compared to the undyed fabric (p > 0.001).

As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).

Following retinal ischemia, an extremely significant drop ( P < 0.001) in ERG b-wave amplitude/ratio was observed (Fig. 2 a/b; Vehicle+IR = 0.03 mV/0.04 ± 0.02; n = 8).

The difference between the control and the 3 mg/ml dose is statistically extremely significant ( P ≤0.001) ( Fig. 1B ).

Interestingly, whereas there were no significant differences between the individual effects of BCM and fresh bone chips, there was an additive and in most of the cases extremely significant ( P < 0.001) effect of fresh bone chips combined with BCM-coated DBBM on the osteogenic gene expression at all three time points (dark green bars).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at p < 0.001 (***). 3.

Daytime temperature treatments had extremely significant effects on the duration of all stages, except for adults (egg, df = 2, χ 2 = 45.602, p < 0.001; larvae, df = 2, χ 2 = 96.213, p < 0.001; pupae, df = 2, χ 2 = 112.745, p < 0.001; adult, χ 2 = 14.083; df = 2; p < 0.01; generation time, df = 2, χ 2 = 169.127, p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

Thus, trans -2-dodecenal showed an extremely significant repellent effect on oviposition at the tested concentrations (0.62 mg/mL: χ 2 = 98.88, p < 0.001; 1.25 mg/mL: χ 2 = 137.92, p < 0.001; 2.5 mg/mL: χ 2 = 184.70, p < 0.001; 5 mg/mL: χ 2 = 204.86, p < 0.001; and 10 mg/mL: χ 2 = 256.29, p < 0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

Decision-making efficiency (number of adjustments) Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the main effect of strategy conditions on the number of adjustments was extremely significant ( F (1, 17) = 185.3, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.91).

For significance analyses, analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups was used and * p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant, ** p ≤ 0.01 as highly significant and *** p ≤ 0.001 as extremely significant.

The null hypothesis that there is no difference in removing the print supports before or after final curing is therefore refuted, with an extremely significant result ( p -value < 0.001).

Statistical analysis showed that the difference was extremely significant, p < 0.001 (Fig. 3b ).

Compared with the rates at1 and 7 days after irradiation, the decrease at 21 and 35 days after irradiation was extremely significant (all p < 0.001).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05, strongly significant at P < 0.01, and extremely significant at P < 0.001.

In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.