“extremely significant”

However, there were extremely significant differences in video duration and information quality ( P < 0.001).

The AMMI analysis showed that genotype, environment, and the GEI had extremely significant effects on Gardenia jasminoides crocin contents ( p < .001).

The difference in PD - L1 expression level between the two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).

Results were considered significant if p<0.05, very significant if p<0.01 and extremely significant if p<0.001.

The degrees of significance were as follows after the post hoc screening: not significant ( p > 0.05), significant ( p ≤ 0.05), very significant ( p ≤ 0.01), and extremely significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

In order to see if there are significant differences in the four tested time points, the ANOVA unifactorial test and Friedman test were applied, resulting in extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the brachial AIx (%) and PWVao values during the study period.

Changes in BINs composition were nevertheless extremely significant depending on the life stage considered or between the two sampled forests ( p < 0.001 after Holm correction method on 10 Anova runs), but not between tree holes (Figure 5 ). 4.

Statistical analysis showed that the difference was extremely significant, p < 0.001 (Fig. 3b ).

The difference between the control and the 3 mg/ml dose is statistically extremely significant ( P ≤0.001) ( Fig. 1B ).

As shown in Figure 2 B and C, the molecular contents of sCD4 and sCD8 in the DuCV group at 8 to 16 dpi were highly significant ( P < 0.01) lower than those in the PBS group, 24 to 32 dpi was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) lower than that in the PBS group, the content of sCD8 in the 8 dpi PBS group was highly significant ( P < 0.01) higher than that in the DuCV group, and 16 to 32 dpi was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) higher than that in the DuCV group.

P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*) if P < 0.05, as very significant (**) if P < 0.01, and as extremely significant (***) if P < 0.001.

As can be seen from Table 4 , the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.001), the coefficient of determination R 2 of the model is 0.9973, and the lack of fit is not significant (0.7224 > 0.05).

Among the 13 distinct features selected, four features (LM-W LHL -G-MaxProb-T2, TM-W LHL -G-MaxProb-T2, LM-W HLL - G-MaxProb-T2, E-W HLH -H-Max-T2) were statistically extremely significant (p-value < 0.001), seven features (E-W HHL -H-Max_T2, T-H-Min-T2, TM-W HLH -H-Min-T1, E-MedianLBP-T1, T-MedianLBP-T1, E-W HLH -H-MeanAbsDev-T2, TM-GE-Convexity-T1) were statistically highly significant (p-value < 0.01), and two features (TM-W HLH -H-Min-T2, LM-W HLL -H-Range-T2) were statistically significant (p-value < 0.05), between the LC versus LF outcomes.

* p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance, ** p < 0.01 was highly significant difference and *** p < 0.001 extremely significant difference.

For PPN, X′ 1 , X′ 2 , X′ 1 X′ 3 , X′ 3 2 was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

P <0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference, P <0.01 was considered to indicate a highly significant difference, while P <0.001 was considered extremely significant.

The results showed that the HG group had significantly higher values for all these indicators compared to the CG group (P < 0.05), with waistline, VFA, and SCr showing an extremely significant difference (P < 0.001).

GSEA performed to evaluate concordance in transcriptional profile between the n = 238 genes included in the commercially available endometrial receptivity array and the LH + 7 versus LH + 2 UF-EV comparison demonstrated an extremely significant and consistent enrichment, with a normalized enrichment score (NES)=9.38 ( P < 0.001) for transcripts up-regulated in LH + 7 in the commercial array and enriched in LH + 7 UF-EVs, and a NES = −5.40 ( P < 0.001) for transcripts down-regulated in LH + 7 in the commercial array and depleted in LH + 7 UF-EVs.

For significance analyses, analysis of variance (ANOVA) between groups was used and * p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant, ** p ≤ 0.01 as highly significant and *** p ≤ 0.001 as extremely significant.

In the correlation analysis with biomass, there was a significant positive correlation between forbs with aboveground and underground biomass ( p < 0.05) and an extremely significant positive correlation with total biomass ( p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).

The best effective group was a combination of curcumin 50 mg/kg with piperine 20 mg/kg which showed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) decrease and increase in ECG and serum biomarker level, respectively, and moderate significant ( P < 0.01) decrease in lipid profile, antioxidant levels, and histopathological score, compared to curcumin alone-treated group.

Significant differences with p ≤ 0.05 are indicated by *, very significant differences ( p ≤ 0.01) by **, and extremely significant by *** ( p ≤ 0.001). p > 0.05 was considered to be not significant. 3.

In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.