“extremely significant”

There were extremely significant differences between the Li and Han groups in the mother’s lifestyle and the use of intrapartum antibiotics (Chi-square, both p = 0.001).

* P -values of 0.001 to 0.05 reflected statistically significant differences; ** P -values of 0.001 to <0.01 were considered highly significant; and *** P -values <0.001 reflected extremely significant differences.

p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) highly significant and p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.

The results were deemed significant at 0.01<*P≤0.05, very significant at 0.001<**P≤0.01, extremely significant at 0.0001<***P≤0.001 and extremely significant at ****P≤0.0001 Supporting information Supporting figures, imaging conditions, image processing, and statistical analyses are reported in the supplementary information.

The linear term B and quadratic term B 2 had extremely significant effects on the DH ( p < 0.001). 3.4.2.

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).

The difference between means is significant if p < 0.05 (*), very significant if p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant if p < 0.001 (***).

Generally, before the low-temperature stress, an extremely significant and positive correlation (P< 0.001) was observed between F 0 with F V and F M ; F V with F M , F V /F 0 , and F V /F M (Spearman’s r > 0.95) ( Figure 6 ).

Then the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the post-test dart scores, which showed that the extremely significant difference between the two groups ( Z = -4.37, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.55), the performance of the self-talk group (median: 103.87; IQR: 3.52) was higher than that of the control group (median: 100.87; IQR: 0.75).

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 <p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.

purpureus CSU-M183 were extremely significant (p<0.001) compared to that of M . purpureus LQ-6 at 4th day; while the relative expression levels of MpigA , MpigJ , MpigK , cit S , cit C in M . purpureus CSU-M183 were extremely significant (p<0.001) than that of M . purpureus LQ-6 at 7th day.

The p -value of this experimental model is much less than 0.01, indicating that this model has a high degree of significance (significant at p < 0.05, extremely significant at p < 0.001), and the lack of fit p = 0.077 < 0.05 indicates that the experimental processes are nearly not affected by other unknown factors.

C8α levels in vitreous of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis was around 137 ± 25.86, which was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) in comparison to control (1.20 ± 1.20).

Results were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*), highly significant when p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant when p < 0.001 (***). 5.

In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.

The best effective group was a combination of curcumin 50 mg/kg with piperine 20 mg/kg which showed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) decrease and increase in ECG and serum biomarker level, respectively, and moderate significant ( P < 0.01) decrease in lipid profile, antioxidant levels, and histopathological score, compared to curcumin alone-treated group.

The quantitative analysis of Figure 8D further verified the above results, and the differences in apoptosis rate, number of migrating/invading cells, and protein expression between groups reached extremely significant levels ( P < 0.001).

The obese group showed a significant decrease ( P value<0.05) after 24 weeks of insulin therapy and an extremely significant decrease ( P <0.001) in TNF-α and IL-6 levels after 48 weeks of therapy.

The association between DDIs and congestive heart failure, four-co-morbid conditions and polypharmacy were statistically extremely significant (P = 0.001) using Mann–Whitney U -test ( Table 4 ).

Student’s t -tests showed that methylation levels of DMCs in promoter, exon and intron regions were significantly different between CpG islands and CpG island shores ( P < 0.05), while those of intergenic regions were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 5C ).

This variance explained increased when considering the left exteroceptive network, attaining a correlation coefficient of 0.35 or an R-squared of about 10% (which was extremely significant P < 0.001 ).

A P -value > 0.05 was considered not significant, P < 0.05 was deemed significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

The mRNA expression of HDAC6 protein low expression (3.1740±1.61934) was markedly lower than that in protein high expression (8.8492±2.39726), and the difference was extremely significant ( t =−6.856, P <0.001).