“extremely significant”

6 A, inactivation assay unveiled that the PRRSV content exhibited an extremely significant (p < 0.001) dose-dependent decrease, indicating that Gel-FeS NPs possess virucidal activity in vitro.

A P -value > 0.05 was considered not significant, P < 0.05 was deemed significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

There were extremely significant differences between the Li and Han groups in the mother’s lifestyle and the use of intrapartum antibiotics (Chi-square, both p = 0.001).

Results were considered significant when p < 0.05 (*), highly significant when p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant when p < 0.001 (***). 5.

The p -value of this experimental model is much less than 0.01, indicating that this model has a high degree of significance (significant at p < 0.05, extremely significant at p < 0.001), and the lack of fit p = 0.077 < 0.05 indicates that the experimental processes are nearly not affected by other unknown factors.

However, there were extremely significant differences among the three analytes ( p < 0.001).

The regression coefficients for both equations were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

Additionally, concentrations of 5 mg/L and higher for more than 4 days exhibited a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of Foc TR4 mycelia, with the inhibitory effect being extremely significant at concentrations of 40 mg/L and higher ( p < 0.001).

C8α levels in vitreous of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis was around 137 ± 25.86, which was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) in comparison to control (1.20 ± 1.20).

P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*) if P < 0.05, as very significant (**) if P < 0.01, and as extremely significant (***) if P < 0.001.

Then the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyse the post-test dart scores, which showed that the extremely significant difference between the two groups ( Z = -4.37, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.55), the performance of the self-talk group (median: 103.87; IQR: 3.52) was higher than that of the control group (median: 100.87; IQR: 0.75).

Overexpression of the Acot2 gene promotes the preadipocyte differentiation The detection of the Acot2 overexpression showed that the overexpression efficiency was extremely significant ( Figure 4(a ), P < 0.001).

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 <p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.

The difference between means is significant if p < 0.05 (*), very significant if p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant if p < 0.001 (***).

In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.

Judging by the magnitude of the P -value, P <0.05 represented a significant difference, P <0.01 represented a highly significant difference, and P <0.001 represented an extremely significant difference.

By contrast, change leadership had extremely significant effects on adaptive behavior (γ = 0.33, p < 0.001), proactive behavior (γ = 0.38, p < 0.001), and perceived change fairness (γ = 0.62, p < 0.001).

The difference of injury severity between patients who survived the Wenchuan, Yushu, and Jiuzhaigou earthquakes was extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

The linear term B and quadratic term B 2 had extremely significant effects on the DH ( p < 0.001). 3.4.2.

The frequencies of MNPCEs induced by CP in peripheral blood of mice were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) to that of the normal group [ Table 2 ].

Statistical differences are considered significant at a p < 0.05 significance level and marked with “∗”, very significant at p < 0.01 and labeled with “∗∗”, and extremely significant at p < 0.001 and labeled with “∗∗∗”.

Table 3 shows that parents’ emotional status has extremely significant influences on irritability of the youth ( P< 0.001).

Student’s t -tests showed that methylation levels of DMCs in promoter, exon and intron regions were significantly different between CpG islands and CpG island shores ( P < 0.05), while those of intergenic regions were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 5C ).

The mRNA expression of HDAC6 protein low expression (3.1740±1.61934) was markedly lower than that in protein high expression (8.8492±2.39726), and the difference was extremely significant ( t =−6.856, P <0.001).

The quantitative analysis of Figure 8D further verified the above results, and the differences in apoptosis rate, number of migrating/invading cells, and protein expression between groups reached extremely significant levels ( P < 0.001).