PERMANOVA analysis revealed extremely significant differences between fallen leaf and fecal bacterial communities (F = 13.47, R 2 = 0.53, p < 0.001).
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
Besides, our study showed an extremely significant increase (p < 0.001) in SARS-CoV-2 infection from 0.7% in January 2020 to 20% in September 2020 (Table 3 ).
As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).
The drug released from nanoemulsion was extremely significant (p<0.001) in comparison to commercial capsules, having the same quantity of SYN ( Figure 8 ).
extremely significantqualified
For a differential characterization the following additional designations were chosen: p ≤ 0.01: highly significant; p ≤ 0.001: extremely significant.
The results showed that the HG group had significantly higher values for all these indicators compared to the CG group (P < 0.05), with waistline, VFA, and SCr showing an extremely significant difference (P < 0.001).
The obese group showed a significant decrease ( P value<0.05) after 24 weeks of insulin therapy and an extremely significant decrease ( P <0.001) in TNF-α and IL-6 levels after 48 weeks of therapy.
The combined effect of water treatment and cultivar had a significant effect on AP levels ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant effect on S-CAT levels ( P < 0.001).
There was no significant difference in FAK expression, but p-FAK expression showed an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001).
extremely significantqualified
A probability of p < 0.10 was considered as marginally significant, of p < 0.05 as significant, of p < 0.01 as highly significant and of p < 0.001 as extremely significant.
While at 48 and 72 hours of treatments all 25, 50 and 75 μM EL doses showed extremely significant decrease in growth (p ≤ 0.001 for 24, 48 and 72 h) compared to untreated cells.
There is an extremely significant difference between the two hospitals’ mean numbers of clicks ( p < 0. 001), compared with no significant difference between their mean numbers of likes.
Student’s t -tests showed that methylation levels of DMCs in promoter, exon and intron regions were significantly different between CpG islands and CpG island shores ( P < 0.05), while those of intergenic regions were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 5C ).
However, an extremely significant age effect was observed in relation to both NgR (F 2,30 = 104.653; P <0.001) and p75 (F 2,30 = 22.782; P <0.001) protein levels in the prefrontal cortex of the treated rats.
extremely significantqualified
p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 as extremely significant (***). 3.
Differences were considered statistically significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01, extremely significant at *** p < 0.001, and very extremely significant at **** p < 0.0001.
In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.
The best effective group was a combination of curcumin 50 mg/kg with piperine 20 mg/kg which showed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) decrease and increase in ECG and serum biomarker level, respectively, and moderate significant ( P < 0.01) decrease in lipid profile, antioxidant levels, and histopathological score, compared to curcumin alone-treated group.
Statistics GraphPad (version 5) was used to calculate unpaired and paired p values: ***, extremely significant, p < 0.001; **, very significant, p = 0.001-0.01; *, significant, p = 0.01-0.05; and ns , p > 0.05.
The correlation analysis showed a positive, very strong, and extremely significant relationship (p<0.001) between the total scores and all subscale scores of PMOI and TMENS ( Table 3 ).
However, there were extremely significant differences in video duration and information quality ( P < 0.001).
extremely significantqualified
P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (*), P < 0.01 were considered highly significant ( ⁎⁎ ) and P < 0.001 were considered extremely significant ( ⁎⁎⁎ ), respectively. 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Synthesis and characterization of B-TPP As depicted in Scheme 1 , carbodiimide chemistry was used to covalently conjugate TPP to Brij 98.
10 The overall meta-analysis study was extremely significant with a P value < 0.001 with a pooled estimate of 7.987 and CI (5.334, 10.639), confirming the significance of the results and the presence of the real effect of the use of the particulate systems on the pharmacodynamic responses of the investigated drugs, as revealed by AUEC.
Compared with the model group, the petroleum ether group has extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001), and the ethyl acetate group and the medicinal control group have significant difference ( p < 0.05).
The mRNA expression of HDAC6 protein low expression (3.1740±1.61934) was markedly lower than that in protein high expression (8.8492±2.39726), and the difference was extremely significant ( t =−6.856, P <0.001).