Data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 7.0 statistical software, with p < 0.05 indicating a statistically significant difference, p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 indicating an extremely significant difference.
Results An extremely significant difference was noted (p < 0.001) before and after treatment in both groups.
An extremely significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001) was obtained by comparing the length of pars plana between control eyes and myopic eyes.
Results of both were statistically evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t-test and considered significant ( P < 0.05), highly significant ( P < 0.01), or extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).
10 The overall meta-analysis study was extremely significant with a P value < 0.001 with a pooled estimate of 7.987 and CI (5.334, 10.639), confirming the significance of the results and the presence of the real effect of the use of the particulate systems on the pharmacodynamic responses of the investigated drugs, as revealed by AUEC.
The differences among C 3 , C 4 , and C 5 groups were not significant, but compared with other groups, the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), so the preservation effect was the best when the supplemental amount was 0.3~0.5 g/kg.
C8α levels in vitreous of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis was around 137 ± 25.86, which was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) in comparison to control (1.20 ± 1.20).
In the patients grouped by hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, we observed extremely significant differences in mean age ( p < 0.001).
The differences were considered significant for *P < 0.05, and highly significant for **P < 0.01 and extremely significant for ***P < 0.001 28 .
The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).
The LOD scores of QTLs related to TPA_leaf, T10_Panicle, and Area_root traits were 11.0, 6.56, and 5.39, respectively, and there was an extremely significant difference between the two parental haplotypes ( p < 0.001).
By contrast, change leadership had extremely significant effects on adaptive behavior (γ = 0.33, p < 0.001), proactive behavior (γ = 0.38, p < 0.001), and perceived change fairness (γ = 0.62, p < 0.001).
However, for the other angles or distance, there were extremely significant differences between the estimated and actual values ( P < 0.001), except for “distance 1” ( P = 0.003).
The regression coefficients for both equations were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).
Then by a Chi-square test, we found the association between the two partitions was extremely significant (p<0.001), indicating our hypothesis can be confirmed in this way.
There is an extremely significant quadratic correlation ( p < .001) between orchid species richness and each of longitude, latitude, and elevation. 3.2.
More ANOVA and t -tests were calculated, with extremely significant results— p < 0.001.
The significance of differences in the comparison of data was calculated using the two-sided Student`s t test, with p < 0.05 rated as statistically significant) (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**) and p < 0.001 as extremely significant (***); p > 0.05 was rated as not significant (n.s.).
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, very significant if 0.001 < p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001.
The trait correlations were all extremely significant ( P ≤ 0.001), except for the correlation between GL and GW at SZ (−0.08 with P ≤ 0.5) in MH63 background.
Repeated-measures ANOVA reported an extremely significant difference ( P = 0.0014).
They found 145 popliteal cysts in 382 knees (38%) and that there was extremely significant association between knee joint effusion and popliteal cyst ( P = 0.002).
It is worth noting that the analysis of results showed that the triple interaction among the group, brain regions and frequency bands was extremely significant, F (4, 348) = 4.38, p = 0.002, η 2 p = 0.05.
In this instance, a one-sample t -test was extremely significant ( T = 3.58, df = 11, p = 0.002).