“extremely significant”

The combined effect of water treatment and cultivar had a significant effect on AP levels ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant effect on S-CAT levels ( P < 0.001).

Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale (* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, highly significant; *** p < 0.001, extremely significant).

Then by a Chi-square test, we found the association between the two partitions was extremely significant (p<0.001), indicating our hypothesis can be confirmed in this way.

Patrinoside A did not significantly inhibit LPS-induced IL-6 at 12.5 μ M ( P > 0.05), but showed extremely significant inhibition at 25 and 50 μ M, and the inhibitory effect was the best at 25 μ M ( P < 0.001).

Differences were considered significant (*) for p < 0.05, highly significant (**) for p < 0.01, and extremely significant (***) for p < 0.001.

From the table, it can be seen that the both second-order models were extremely significant (*P <0.001), the lack-of-fit term were not, anyway.

The results were deemed significant at 0.01<*P≤0.05, very significant at 0.001<**P≤0.01, extremely significant at 0.0001<***P≤0.001 and extremely significant at ****P≤0.0001 Supporting information Supporting figures, imaging conditions, image processing, and statistical analyses are reported in the supplementary information.

There is an extremely significant quadratic correlation ( p < .001) between orchid species richness and each of longitude, latitude, and elevation. 3.2.

Statistical significant ( p < 0.05), highly significant ( p < 0.01), and extremely significant ( p < 0.001) features are indicated with (∗), (∗∗), and (∗∗∗) respectively.

Statistical differences are considered significant at a p < 0.05 significance level and marked with “∗”, very significant at p < 0.01 and labeled with “∗∗”, and extremely significant at p < 0.001 and labeled with “∗∗∗”.

Table 3 shows that parents’ emotional status has extremely significant influences on irritability of the youth ( P< 0.001).

The results were considered very significant if p < 0.01 and extremely significant if p < 0.001 and marked with two or three asterisks, respectively. 3.

MRT 0-∞ and t 1/2 of WEP-GU decreased and had a very significant difference ( P < 0.01) compared with Control, AUC 0-∞ decreased and had a extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001) compared with Control.

p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) highly significant and p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.

As depicted in Figure 3 A,B, the effect of NEFA on the apoptosis rate of cells was dose-dependent, and it was extremely significant in comparison to the control group ( p < 0.001).

However, nasal width (al-al) was greater and extremely significant with a mean difference of 8.3 mm ( p < 0.001) in males and 9.3 mm ( p < 0.001) in females.

The difference between means is significant if p < 0.05 (*), very significant if p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant if p < 0.001 (***).

BIV and HIRRV infections showed highly significant ( p < 0.01), and IHNV infection showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), but infection with LCDV showed no significant difference from the control group ( p > 0.05) ( Figure 9 B).

In particular, cells grown on PDGF-BB- or FGF-2-coated matrices were characterized with an extremely significant ( p < 0.001) increase in the expression levels of PLAT, PLAU, PLAUR, and MMP14 genes.

6 A, inactivation assay unveiled that the PRRSV content exhibited an extremely significant (p < 0.001) dose-dependent decrease, indicating that Gel-FeS NPs possess virucidal activity in vitro.

By contrast, change leadership had extremely significant effects on adaptive behavior (γ = 0.33, p < 0.001), proactive behavior (γ = 0.38, p < 0.001), and perceived change fairness (γ = 0.62, p < 0.001).

P value ≤ 0.0001 is considered as extremely significant (****), P ≤ 0.001 as highly significant (***), P ≤ 0.01 as very significant (**), P ≤ 0.05 as significant (*) and P > 0.05 as not significant (NS), respectively.

In the figures, “*” denotes significant differences ( p < 0.05), “***” denotes extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and “ns” indicates no significant difference. 3.

The best effective group was a combination of curcumin 50 mg/kg with piperine 20 mg/kg which showed extremely significant ( P < 0.001) decrease and increase in ECG and serum biomarker level, respectively, and moderate significant ( P < 0.01) decrease in lipid profile, antioxidant levels, and histopathological score, compared to curcumin alone-treated group.

For the first node, there were seven possible pairs, and it was apparent that the majority of features were extremely significant between the normal person samples and the patient samples (N vs. rest, 57 features with p <0.001) among all these possible pairs.