“extremely significant”

The level of estradiol increased significantly after subject 296 entered the reproductive period, and the difference between the early reproductive stage and the non-breeding stage was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

They had extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

The percentage of T cells in the S phase and G2/M phase of the TA-P and positive group increased, while the S phase and G2/M phase of the TA-P group showed a significant difference ( p < 0.05) and the G2/M phase of the positive group showed an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01), increasing from 27.30% to 31.80%, compared with the blank group.

For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).

The four immune parameters were significantly higher in the multiple-crested-cushion group than in the single-crested-cushion group, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

We noted a positive correlation between Mg and K in the five growth stages of CV duck, which showed an extremely significant difference between 0 and 21 days old ( p < 0.01), as well as a significant difference between 35 and 63 days old ( p < 0.05).

The comparison between the C and B Group, on the third day showed that the difference was extremely significant (t=5.32, P <0.01).

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or *, extremely significant at P < 0.01 or **.

Results Characterization of physicochemical properties of different species of litter There were extremely significant differences in Dw ( p < 0.01, F = 3296.941), total C ( p < 0.01, F = 20.538), total P ( p < 0.05, F = 7.668), C/N ( p < 0.01, F = 68.247), N/P ( p < 0.01, F = 21.415), and C/P ( p < 0.01, F = 26.931) among the three types of leaf litter, but there was no significant difference in the content of total N ( p > 0.05, F = 4.355), as shown in Table 1 .

Data comparison employed one-way analysis of variance test, with subsequent Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and significant difference was inferred for p<0.05 and extremely significant difference p<0.01.

The results revealed that the effects of A, B, C, AC, BC, A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant ( P < 0.01); the AB response was not significant ( P > 0.05); the linear and quadratic terms of A were significantly higher than those of the other factors.

Statistical analysis of the relative mRNA expression level between transcriptomic data and qPCR data was performed using Student’s t-test with SPSS 26.0 (v26) software, and the differences were considered significant when the p value < 0.05 (*) and extremely significant when the p value < 0.01 (**). 5.

One unanticipated finding was that multiple ARGs revealed significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) correlations.

Significant differences between means were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD test (SPSS software version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05, and extremely significant difference was at p < 0.01, respectively. 3.

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

In this study, we further verified that the correlation relationship between HSEs and up-regulated genes was extremely significant (Fisher’s exact test, ∗∗ p < 0.01), which suggested that HSFs could upregulate HSP20 genes for African bermudagrass to cope with high temperature.

The significance level was P < 0.05, the extremely significant level was P < 0.01, the difference was not significant if P > 0.05.

On comparing three groups for assessing pain after 24 h and 7 days, again, an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) was found.

Leaf area, leaf shape index, leaf fresh weight and leaf dry weight were all showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among several treatments ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

In addition, the mean value of each trait among progeny was positively correlated with the average parental value, with correlation coefficients ( r po ) ranging from 0.33 to 0.73, of which oil and SW appeared to be extremely significant ( p < 0.01) (Fig. 3 ).

The difference between groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

frequency shows an extremely significant impact on the expression of likability (F = 19.965, p < 0.01), and the impact on animacy is also significant (F = 5.203, p < 0.05).

The expression of StTCP15 gene increased during dormancy release, and the difference between dormancy and dormancy release was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), dormancy release and sprouting were about 4.35 and 9.00 times that in dormancy, respectively ( Figure 1C ).

During the long-term storage of CWT, the characteristics of six typical aroma sub-attributes were happened significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant changes ( P < 0.01) ( Figure 2C ).

However, there was extremely significant correlation between ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging capacities ( P < 0.01) ( Table 3 ).