Barely Significant
← all phrases

“fell just short of significance”

103 sentences · 103 papers · 120 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

2005 ) and RRs for colorectal cancer of 1.41 at ADVs of 45 g and greater, with an RR of 1.16 that fell just short of significance for ADVs of 30 g to 44 g ( Cho et al. 2004 ).
Defining risk drinking.
Alcohol Res Health · 2011 · PMC3860565
The 1‐day effect was highly significant, while variability within the 3‐day control group meant that the effect of occlusion at this time point fell just short of significance after correction for multiple comparisons (1‐day mean ± SEM fold change: sham, 1.11 ± 0.12; occluded, 0.31 ± 0.046; Welch's t test with α = .025, t 18.25 = 6.45, p < .0001, N = 29; 3‐day: sham, 1.36 ± 0.38; occluded, 0.42 ± 0.13; Welch's t test with α = .025, t 8.50 = 2.33, p = .046; N = 16).
Similarly, there were significant associations between perceptual sensitivity at 8 and 14 months ( β = 0.50 and p < 0.001) and 8 to 24 months ( β = 0.37 and p < 0.001), and the association between 14 and 24 months ( β = 0.15 and p = 0.06) scores fell just short of significance.
Results Children from the most deprived neighbourhoods had increased rates of albuterol (rate ratio (RR)=1.22, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.32) compared with those in the least deprived neighbourhoods, while the point estimate for inhaled steroids was higher, but fell just short of significance at the alpha=0.05 level (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.34).