“highly significant”

The results of intergroup comparison using the independent-t-test showed a highly significant (p<0.001) distinction between the control and LLLT groups at different time intervals (baseline and six months after) (Table 1 , Figure 4 ).

These improvements were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) using Bhapkar’s test.

p value of <0.05 was considered significant; p value of <0.01, highly significant; and p value of <0.001, extremely significant. 5.

Although estimates were lower when the resampling size was smaller, as expected, there was a highly significant correlation between A r and pA r using both resampling techniques (Kendall's Tau = 0.78, p < 0.001), indicating that uneven sampling across time did not impact overall conclusions about regional genetic diversity.

Highly significant performance group differences were recorded for measures % hit (F1,68 = 181.5; P < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.73), % correct (F1,68 = 39.6; P < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.37), omissions (F1,68 = 68.4; P < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.50), and correct latency (F1,68 = 12.3; P < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.16) reflecting a strong association between each measure (see Figure 1D ). “High performers” were characterized as showing higher accuracy, faster response speed and fewer omissions compared to their “low” counterparts.

The difference between tuning shifts in attended and unattended conditions is highly significant ( p = 0.001, paired two-sided Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test).

A univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated a highly significant correlation between the duration of storage and the G-TVBN values ( p < 0.001), with the model explaining 97.6% of the variability in G-TVBN concentrations, evidenced by an R 2 value of 0.976.

2a ), there remained a highly significant benefit from chemotherapy in the RS group with RS ≥ 31 (HR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07–0.47; P < 0.001, Fig. 2d ) with Kaplan–Meier estimates of the proportion of patients distant recurrence-free at 10 years at 56.7% (95% CI: 47.2–66.2) in the patients treated with tamoxifen compared to 89.6% (85.9–93.3%) with the addition of chemotherapy.

Highly significant interactions ( p ≤ 0.001) were found among the tested rootstocks and locations regarding vegetative growth parameters, except for the trunk diameter index.

In contrast, highly significant (p < 0.001) differences were seen in all three BNP populations for E99K1 versus E99K1-Corr, wherein E99K1 was 6.92- and 2.97-fold higher for BNP-high and -low cells, respectively, but 6.12-fold lower for BNP-negative cells.

The Omnibus test suggested that the model was highly significant in comparison to the null model (X 2 likelihood ratio = 21,009.250, df = 16, p -value ≤ 0.001).

SBP and DBP decrease from baseline was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

However, the comparisons of the relative abundance of the two universally prevalent etfD homologs revealed highly significant differences between egg batches from different females (GLM; genotype from OTU 1: F 6,119 = 274.1, P < 0.001; genotype from OTU 2: F 6,119 = 140.0, P < 0.001).

The high-risk group (158 observations with 133 events) had a much lower survival probability compared to the low-risk group (274 observations with 37 events) with a highly significant statistical difference in medium survival (p < 0.001, log-rank test; Figure 7 E).

Linear regression indicated that both PFOA concentration and culture time are highly significant predictors for both α and M ( p < 0.001 for all).

The Mann-Whitney test demonstrated a highly significant difference in these salivary pH values ( P < 0.001).

A two-way ANOVA found that fermentation time, pH and their associated interaction have a highly significant effect on both EA and ES (p<0.001).

1 ) showed that there were highly significant, positive correlations between sensitivities to CQ and QN(r = 0.54, P = 0.001).

For moisture, the p -values were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Alaska pollock; p < 0.05 for golden threadfin bream and hairtail).

Comparing the amount of light recorded in week 2 (with BLT) with those of weeks 1 and 3 (without BLT) the difference was highly significant ( F 2 , 35 = 11.59, p < 0.001).

A highly significant main effect of hemisphere, F (2, 52) = 14.64, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.36, was observed, with a higher voltage recorded from electrodes placed at the left (1.26 μV) and right hemispheres (1.42 μV) than from the central (0.03 μV) electrodes, ps < .05.

In these zones, the decrease in cropping area is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Individual comparisons of Faces to each stimulus category (birds, cars, phones, and scrambled faces) revealed highly significant effects (all p < 0.001).

We found a significant endophyte effect ( F 1,28 = 5.084, P = 0.032), a highly significant herbivore effect ( F 1,28 = 50.178, P < 0.001) and no significant interaction effect ( F 1,28 = 1.632, P = 0.212) on shoot fresh weight.

The linear regression revealed a highly significant temporal effect of time ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 ) on glucose release, replicating the effects expected during digestion in the GI tract.