“highly significant”

Welch’s F values are indicated in Table 3 , with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) across all evaluations.

At r = 0.81 the agreement between sABI and aABI was highly significant ( P < .001).

After censoring non disease-related deaths of patients, the disease-free survival was highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).

A highly significant model ( R 2 = 63.2%, P < 0.001) was obtained with three variables: year ( b = 0.61 ± 0.12, P < 0.001), June mean temperature ( b = 3.71 ± 1.13 P = 0.002), and first inspection of hives ( b = −0.21 ± 0.09, P = 0.028).

In addition, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed across multiple feature representations, including raw conductance, temperature, proportional adjustment, and adaptive scaling, consistently yielding highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ).

Separate analyses showed that this occurred because the interaction was highly significant for cavity-nesting species ( t 34 = −3.659, P < 0.001), significant for ground-nesting species ( t 22 = −2.376, P = 0.016) and non-significant for branch nesting species ( t 75 = −0.838, P = 0.253).

MANOVA revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between all populations in raw data as well as in size-corrected data.

A one-way MANOVA on five quantitative leaf traits (55 individuals: 15 Ilex lanceifolia , 20 Ilex xiaojinensis , 20 Ilex peiradena ) revealed a highly significant species effect (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.086, F 10,96 = 23.22, p < 0.001), confirming that the three species are morphologically distinct.

As shown in Table 2 and Table 3 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the quadratic model adequately described the experimental data.

Effects of Grazing on Community-Level Plant Hydraulic Traits Grazing had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on the community-weighted mean (CWM) of six out of the seven hydraulic traits measured; only CWM_C leaf was not significantly affected.

In MCF7 cells, the combined treatment effect was slight at 500 nM doxorubicin ( P = .082), and highly significant at 1500 nM doxorubicin ( P < .001).

Both the Begg and Mazumbar’s test and the Egger’s test resulted in highly significant indicators of publication bias ( P < 0.001).

Statistical analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference among treatments (χ 2 (4) = 77.7, p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ).

There was a highly significant difference in the mean age of participants across the groups ( p < 0.001).

In RS and iCPO patients with FD, a highly significant association was found in CP grade between the two groups ( p < 0.001); while a grade 3 and 4 CP was most common in RS patients with FD (grade 3 = 60 %, n = 37; grade 4 = 23 %, n = 14), a grade 2 CP was most common in iCPO patients with FD (50 %; n = 19; Table 4 ).

One-way ANOVA indicated highly significant treatment effects on growth based on both optical density and dry cell weight ( p < 0.001).

John’s wort, and PPIs, statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed in each case.

Results indicated that the activities of all antioxidant enzymes and their corresponding transcripts underwent highly significant decreases and downregulation in EcV-treated cultures (0.5 μg/ml medium for 4 h) compared to venom-free controls (P<0.001).

( 2019 ) showed that BIA overestimated FFM in obese individuals with a highly significant rate of systematic error ( p = 0.001) (Jensen et al. 2019 ).

The degree of correlation between pain relief with ketamine and dextromethorphan was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

All sequential improvements are highly significant (p < 0.001, McNemar’s test), confirming that gains from class balancing, eGFR regression, and monotonicity enforcement are not due to chance.

This difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that patients with CKD were exposed to greater nitrosative stress (Table 4 ).

The qRT-PCR analysis revealed highly significant ( P < 0.001) induction in the mRNA expression of MMP13 in OSCC patients as compared to matched controls [ Figure 1 ].

Statistical significance: P < 0.05 (significant), P < 0.01 (highly significant), P < 0.001 (extremely significant).

These results were all highly significant ( P < 0.001).