“highly significant”

Specifically, a highly significant interaction was observed between irrational beliefs and health anxiety scores with family history of diabetes on 10-year T2DM risk ( p < 0.001).

It revealed a highly significant main effect of weekly feed intake ( F = 6.46, P < 0.001) and showed that the feed intake of lambs in both groups changed significantly during the 12 weeks.

In terms of inflammatory cytokines, compared with the control group, the O group displayed significant reductions in pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, INF-γ, and TNF-α) and highly significant increases in anti-inflammatory IL-10 ( P < 0.001).

Notably, the genera Pediococcus and Lactiplantibacillus showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) across groups F_1d, NF_1d, F_5d, NF_5d, F_10d, NF_10d, F_15d, and NF_15d.

The overall model was highly significant (Q m = 30.62, P < 0.001) and explained 61.43% of heterogeneity (R 2 = 61.43%).

Performing PCR in discrepant cases either by EIAs or CLIAs would improve the sensitivity of the respective two-step algorithm towards TC in a highly significant manner ( p < 0.001; Table 3 ).

Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant differences in fluorescence intensity between the malignant and normal cell cohorts ( p < 0.001).

In a study of 50 CT scans, when SOEC was absent, the mean AEA–SB distance was only 1.5 mm; when SOEC was present, the mean distance increased significantly to 4.86 mm ( P < 0.001, highly significant)[ 3 ].

ANOVA confirmed highly significant overall differences in performance across groups for both the Y-Maze ( P <0.001, F (4,20) = 108.995) and MWM ( F = 52.878, P <0.0001).

The difference in the mean values of RBC count, Hb, HCT, MCV, MCH, RDW, and RDW-standard deviation (RDW-SD) was highly significant to distinguish between BTT and IDA ( P < 0.001), whereas the MCHC remained nondiscriminant ( P > 0.05) [ Table 1 ].

When the beam breaks were divided into 5 min bins, the activity levels showed a highly significant reduction across the 20 min session (F(3, 36) = 11.4, p < 0.001), with no effect of surgery (F < 1) and no interaction between these factors (F < 1).

As detailed in Table 4 , the standardized factor loadings for the final model range from 0.594 to 0.905, and all are highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The results showed no significant main effect of the CO 2 treatment (F(1, 538) = .49, p = .484), but a highly significant main effect of the three different growth periods (F(2, 538) = 364.89, p <.001) and a highly significant interaction effect between CO 2 and the growing period (F(2, 538) = 29.32, p <.001).

From an inferential standpoint, the Chi-square test demonstrated a highly significant association between distal caries at M2 and caries at M3 ( χ 2(1) = 21.84, p < 0.001), indicating a strong tendency for these two conditions to appear together.

The highly significant fixed intercept indicates that participants kept a comfortable distance to the robot, coeff = 83.03, SE = 5.56, p < .001, 95% CI = [71.77, 94.29].

Overall, there was a strong, highly significant relationship between overall scores in 2012 and 2016 ( Fig 5A ; linear regression model, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.79).

Highly significant dose reductions (p<0.001) were also found for relevant organs of interest adjacent to the scan field (brain -84%, eye lenses -90%) as well as in the direct beam (red bone marrow -20%, salivary glands -84%).

The differences between the two groups were highly significant for all comparisons ( P < 0.001), except for the comparison of the PCT concentrations in bacterial and viral infections with a likely diagnosis based on objective findings.

A binomial GLM indicated a highly significant relationship between frequency and accuracy ( p < 0.001 for all learning rates).

It was observed that 113 (50%) suspected stroke victims who met the activation criteria for the Stroke Code Protocol did not have the protocol activated, which had a highly significant influence ( p < 0.001) on door-to-CT time.

Independently from the fixation technique, the defect size was a main factor that influenced the union time as there was a highly significant correlation between defect size and union-time ( p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.35).

After the remineralization phase, one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among groups for all measured elements ( P < 0.001).

Most critically, the Group × Condition interaction—the key finding of context-dependent decision-making—remained highly significant (OR = 0.50, 95%CI[0.40,0.62], p <.001), though somewhat attenuated compared to the full sample (OR = 0.39).

The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences between FW and SMD at the GKVK location ( P < 0.001, F = 31.71; Supplementary Table S7) and at ICRISAT ( P < 0.001, F = 505.20; Supplementary Table S7), indicating that the two diseases exhibited markedly different patterns of incidence at both sites.

The p overall and p trend for the RS mutations were both highly significant (p<0.001) demonstrating a clear mutagenic effect, with the exception of the lowest dose tested (0.25 Gy) where no RS mutations were observed.