“highly significant”

A mixed model regression across both stimulus types (pattern, flash) collapsed across color showed a highly significant group X stimulus-type interaction (F 1,102 = 23.9, p < 0.001, d = 0.97) ( Figure 1C ) consistent with differential magnocellular vs. parvocellular dysfunction.

The trend toward lower 28-day mortality at a higher Cr/CysC ratio was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ). 3.2 Association between Cr/CysC ratio and 28-day mortality After performing univariate Cox regression analyses ( Supplementary Table S4 ), we constructed six multivariable Cox regression models to assess the relationship between the Cr/CysC ratio and 28-day mortality risk in patients with sepsis.

The results demonstrated that different strategy patterns exhibited highly significant differences across all five dimensions ( p < 0.001).

While the HR for neoplasms and breast cancer were not significant, the HR for CIS was highly significant with p < 0.001, with an age range of 29.4–54.9 years at the time of diagnosis of CIS.

Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that the distance between the head of OMI (HOMI) and IRML (HOMI to IRML) increased with an increase in the placement angle, with highly significant (positive) correlations between the two parameters ( p < 0.001).

Even with the effects of age and high-frequency hearing loss accounted for, there remained a highly significant effect of tinnitus ( F (1,30) = 31.76, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.47) indicating significantly weaker MEMR activation in this group of subjects.

The differences between concentrations and controls were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

These reductions were highly significant compared to their respective baseline values ( p < 0.001).

Total reading time The analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of semantic relation on the noun region, β = 99.68, SE = 6.74, t = 14.79, p < 0.001.

Twenty four highly significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) ( P < 0.001) were identified for nine yield-related traits on chromosomes 1A, 1D, 2A (2), 3B, 4A (2), 4B, 5A (4), 5B (4), 5D, 6B (2), 7A (2), and 7B (3), explaining 10.86–20.27% of the phenotypic variations.

First, while both CRT and retinal vascular density demonstrated highly significant correlations with FAZ area by univariate analysis, CRT demonstrated a stronger correlation ( Fig 2A and 2B ; CRT: P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.356; retinal vascular density: P < 0.001, R 2 = 0.189).

For all the three stress-related traits, we found highly significant differences ( P <0.001) across sexes, seasons and due to acclimation as well as due to their respective interactions ( Table S1 ).

In the statistical analysis treatment × time interaction was highly significant (p = 0.001).

47 Owing to the large sample size, only highly significant results were considered (p < 0.001). 48 3.

ANCOVA with PGY level and baseline SSI-BS as covariates confirmed the group effect remained highly significant (F = 28.4, p < 0.001); neither covariate was significant ( p > 0.20).

Overall, the treatment response among patients with OC was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

A Fisher’s exact test on the 2 × 2 contingency table (therapy group × radiographic progression status) is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Chi-square testing of the association between month and umbilical scar status was highly significant (χ 2 , df = 34, P < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

From 10 minutes until post-extubation and up to 1 hour postoperatively, MAP differences among the groups were highly significant (p < 0.001), with Groups D1 and D2 consistently showing lower values than Group C.

Lower LVEF remained a highly significant predictor of the end stage (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79–0.94, p -value < 0.001), whereas LV volumes were no longer significant after adjustment.

At midline leads (Cz/FCz), the 2 face type × 2 group × 2 attachment × 3 lead repeated measures ANOVA solely revealed a highly significant main effect for lead, F (1, 33) = 12.12, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.27, with Nc amplitude responses being more negative at FCz ( M = −6.84, SE = 0.65) than Cz ( M = −5.33, SE = 0.68).

The reduction in the mean SD along all three axes from 6.4 mm to 3.1 mm was highly significant ( p = 0.001 ) .

Statistical differences were interpreted as significant at p ≤ 0.05 (*), very significant at p ≤ 0.01 (**), highly significant at p ≤ 0.001 (***), and not significant at p > 0.05. 3.

Results: The mean progression after 1 month and the mean predicted progression had been highly significant (unpaired t test, P < .001) in both Gr D and Gr DL , Surgery resulted significant improvement of neurology, pain and disability scores (chi-squared test, P < .05) as well as deformity correction (paired t test, P < .05).

The improvement in pain was highly significant statistically (t = 36.4; P < .001) and clinically (Cohen’s Effect Size = 2.44).