Results and discussion A significant improvement in EWSE Following the 15-week teaching intervention, students’ overall writing self-efficacy significantly increased (M = 2.75, SD = 0.79) compared to pretest levels (M = 1.56, SD = 0.33), with a highly significant difference, t (19) = 8.32, p < 0.001.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
indica showed reduced expression of the FtHCT gene, significantly lower expression of the FtCCOAOM and FtC3H1 genes (p < 0.01), and a highly significant reduction in the expression of the FtCAD6 gene (p < 0.001) compared with the control ( Figure 6B ).
Correlation analysis of vitamin E and chlorophyll components during seed development ( Supplementary Figure S3 ) revealed a highly significant negative correlation across developmental stages (p< 0.001), with correlation intensity varying by genotype.
Bartlett's test was highly significant (p < 0.001), which indicated that correlations between items were sufficiently large for EFA.
As can be seen in Figure 2 , we observed a highly significant deviation of the responses from the flat distribution (χ 2 (2) = 187.6, p < 0.001, V = 0.75).
For female breast cancer, the large declines in incident cases observed from March to November 2020, except for September, remained highly significant ( p < 0.001) during May, July and August 2020 when IRRs were adjusted for age and area-level income deprivation.
Using this refined model, we found that the anatomical fraction had a highly significant influence on glucan digestibility ( P < 0.001), whereas the influence of AcIR content was less important ( P = 0.11).
In plaque index, maximum number of subjects in all the age group were in the fair group, and there was a highly significant ( P value <0.001) association between the age group and the plaque index groups.
Comparable highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive dynamics in the EF was observed in both groups after 6 months from the start of the treatment and by the end of the study ( Figure 3 ).
The likelihood ratio test (Wald chi-squared) of the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the model has a strong explanation power.
However, at both the 11th grade and 12th grade timepoints, THC was a highly significant predictor (both p < 0.001).
With the caveat of the small group sizes, lung pathology scores had a highly significant inverse correlation with peak serum NT 50 values (Spearman r = -0.87; p < 0.001), followed by peak plasma VITROS anti-spike total Ig levels (Spearman r = -0.59, p = 0.046).
Age category was a highly significant predictor (p < 0.001), with negative regression coefficients indicating that higher age categories were associated with significantly lower odds of providing telehealth services.
Correlations with stomach cancer were highly significant (linear correlation coefficients were all above 0.6 and P <0.001) in each sex, for each year analysed.
Those mRNAs encoding connexins identified to have a highly significant prognostic value ( P < 0.001) in any of these cancer types are summarised in Table 1 .
All the fixed effects analyzed—month (year), flock size, flock size × THI, THI (year) and THI (month)—were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all milk composition traits, with the exception of log 10 SCC ( Table 3 ).
Three of the control variables (female age distribution, fertility change, and ratio of proportions dead) were highly significant (p<0.001), and the fourth (lagged HIV prevalence) was significant at 5%.
The difference was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a meaningful rise in IOP following the intervention.
The IPSS was significantly lower in the intervention group (5.16 ± 1.08) compared to the control group (8.39 ± 1.12), with a highly significant statistical difference ( t = 19.509, P < 0.001).
The ANOVA for PC1 yielded a highly significant F value of 183.2 ( p < 0.001), indicating a robust distinction in PC1 values between these groups.
In total 135 gene pairs were with mutually exclusive patterns, of which 22 pairs were significant ( P < 0.05) and seven pairs highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Table S4 ).
Energetics Of the 151 jumps measured here, there was a highly significant decrease in percentage of the energy budget allocated to rotation (F 2,143.07 = 78.972, p < 0.001).
They indicate a significant variation in WQI between water types with a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001) for RWW.
39 , 40 As expected, hip abductors and adductors were stronger in ice hockey players than in controls, and this result was highly significant ( P < .001) ( Table 2 ).
Statistical tests confirm these differences, showing a highly significant result ( p < 0.001) during the 18%–53% phase of running, indicating an increased asymmetry in foot balance in this condition.