“highly significant”

Results Laboratory studies A and B showed highly significant reductions of TPR (p < .001) and MPV (p < .001) with increasing VA (Figure 1 ).

The differences between the distribution of patterns in the study groups were highly significant (χ 2 = 85.65; df = 6; p < .001; φ = .27).

The results were quite similar, and with all five sites taken together, a highly significant increase of kdr-w frequency was detected (X 2 = 40.98, p << 0.001, df = 2), from 0.5% in 2005 to 1.9% in 2006 and 7.2% in 2007.

We conclude, therefore, that co-expression of known gene-pairs is indeed strongest, and highly significant (p-value < 10 -3 ), in the subspace spanned by the central arraylets.

On the other hand, OSI values exerted highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among groups.

The sampling adequacy was acceptable (overall KMO = 0.74; item MSAs: 0.69–0.91), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (10) = 217.66; p < 0.001), confirming sufficient inter-item correlations.

When comparing between the ADRC and ADNI cohorts using non‐PVC data there were highly significant associations for both age (Figure 2A: r=0.83, p<0.001) and sex (Figure 2C: r=0.95, p<0.001).

Tukey’s test based on the first principal coordinate values revealed highly significant differences between H and D as well as between AL and D (P < 0.001 in both cases).

In Aryans, highly significant ( P <0.001) but weak correlations were found between CW and IAW, IPD, and ICOW.

ELTS and EUTOS scores were highly significant in the adults p < 0.001; HR = 7; CI 3.29–14.89 and p = 0.001; HR = 3.4, CI 1.66–6.98, respectively.

Markedly, cure rates improved from 44.9% to 65.7%, while treatment completion dropped from 42.1% to 22.6%, with a highly significant overall difference in outcomes ( p < 0.001).

The heterogeneity accounting for the differences in effect sizes among the studies included in the meta-analysis was large and highly significant (Q (51) = 179.742, p < 0.001).

Furthermore, a comparative analysis of the mean age between the group with and without OA on at least one side using t-test revealed a highly significant statistical difference (61 years for OA + and 34 years for OA-, p < 0.001).

The effect of housing proved highly significant (F 1,35 = 32.86, P < 0.001), suggesting that individual hens’ startle amplitudes were decreased by Enriched housing and increased by Control housing.

In contrast, only CV CL showed a highly significant negative correlation with temperature in diploids ( p = 0.001, 95% CI [-0.910, -0.346]).

The investigators reported that 1 in 5 infants with eczema were allergic to peanut, egg or sesame, compared to only 1 in 25 infants without eczema, and these results were noted to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 29 ].

There was a highly significant interaction between Run Length and Reference bp ( F 5, 8865 = 11.02, P < 0.001; fig. 1 A ).

Marked correlation (ρ = 0.738) were found highly significant ( p < 0.001) between circulating UREA and ALT.

Results All mARC plans were considered valid for treatment and yielded a highly significant improvement in the CI over 3D-CRT plans (p <0.001).

The number of ANC visits demonstrated a highly significant association (p < 0.001).

This increase became highly significant (p < 0.001) after 4 h of incubation with the dye (1.2 for 50 μM and 1.3 for 100 μM).

In addition, RAB3C and STK33 exhibited significant differences ( p < 0.01), while HERC5 demonstrated highly significant differential expression ( p < 0.001), suggesting a potential role in drug resistance and mitophagy-related pathways.

Highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlations and nearly identical regression lines between PAS and TSUI were found for female and male patients (see inserts in the left and right part of Figure 2 ).

The tendon factor, representing the difference between tendon types, was highly significant ( F (1,38) = 107.71, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.818), indicating a significant difference in area measurements between the patellar and peroneal tendons.

At the same time, the direct effect of the TyG index on arteriosclerosis remained highly significant (β = 0.085, P < 0.001), indicating that the TyG index itself has a considerable positive impact on the risk of arteriosclerosis, even without considering ABI levels.