“highly significant”

Significance was reported using standard academic conventions, with stars indicating levels of significance: * p < 0.05 (Significant); ** p < 0.01 (Highly Significant); *** p < 0.001 (Very Highly Significant).

The median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients classified as responders by DECT reached 623 days, compared with a mere 104 days for nonresponders, representing a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

The difference between the two cohorts was highly significant ( χ 2 = 92.7; df = 3; p < 0.001; total N = 518).

4 and 5) obtained using the image and traditional methods shows a highly significant ( P < 0.001 ) correlation ( r = 1.000 ). 3.2.

The difference in in-hospital length of stay remained highly significant (p <0.001), the 30-day mortality remained comparable (0% in MWT vs. 3.8% in STR; p = 0.12), the reoperation rate for bleeding remained nonsignificant (3.3% in MWT vs. 5.7% in STR; p = 0.51), and no significant difference was observed in infection rates.

The analysis revealed highly significant upregulation of SREBF2 and UCP2 in RSA samples ( p < 0.001), while PPARG and SQLE also showed significant differential expression ( p < 0.05).

II survival difference was non-significant ( p = 0.051), with all other stage pairs showing highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

The standardized factor loadings for items ES1 (0.914), ES2 (0.821), and ES3 (0.724) were all highly significant at the p < 0.001 level.

Particular attention must be paid to the main effect path: In the baseline model excluding mediators, the total effect of T1 Policy Attitude on T3 Consumption Intention was highly significant ( β = 0.340, p < 0.001).

Results demonstrated a highly significant main effect of time ( F = 278.003, P < 0.001), indicating that herniation volume significantly decreased at all postoperative time points compared to preoperative levels across all patients.

The coarse fraction (PM Coarse ) remained a highly significant independent predictor for lung cancer (β Coarse = 2.85, p < 0.001), suggesting that larger industrial particles play a specialized role in oncology admissions.

The interaction term was highly significant (Δ R 2 = 0.05, p < 0.001).

With just a few exceptions, all pairwise comparisons were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Table S7), with 44 displaying highly significant differences ( P < 0.001).

The highly significant effect of time on allelic loss ( F (9,18) = 12.554, p < 0.001) confirms that DNA degradation follows a measurable chronological progression rather than an erratic pattern.

The standard drug too caused highly significant inhibition of paw edema throughout the observation period ( p < 0.001).

Similarly, for serum MTL ( Figure 3C ), the NMs level was profoundly lower than that of the NC ( p < 0.001), and the HF demonstrated a highly significant increase compared to the NM ( p < 0.001).

Analysis of the relationship between themes and emotions Addressing the study’s primary analytical aim of characterizing the association between thematic content and viewer-reported emotional responses, the distribution of emotional responses across different types of artistic themes revealed significant differences, with chi-square analysis confirming a highly significant overall association ( χ 2 = 234.7, df = 12, p < 0.001, Cramer’s V = 0.24).

However, a highly significant difference was observed for DD correction ( p < 0.001), with greater corrections seen in severe cases compared to mild and moderate ones.

The analysis revealed a highly significant difference in mean infection rates among provinces (F 4, 595 = 13.69, P < 0.001).

2 C), demonstrating that patients in the high-risk group exhibited significantly worse prognosis, with highly significant survival differences between high and low risk groups ( p < 0.001).

The Chi-square test for group-by-era association was highly significant ( p < 0.001), reflecting progressive adoption of MEVL rather than random allocation.

Although the classical models like SVM, Naive bayes, random forest, and XGBoost have a non-significantly improved p -value = 0.1 and even more complex models like GRU, Bi-GRU, and BERT have only marginal statistical relevance ( p = 0.08–0.15), the model has highly significant p -value = 4.87 and p = 0.001, which is supported by a Wilcoxon = 3.92 and p = 0.019.

The differences between the NC and si groups were statistically highly significant at 24 h ( p < 0.001), 48 h ( p < 0.0001), and 72 h ( p < 0.0001).

Unsurprisingly, the pre-PEG B12 value remained the single most dominant predictor, with its effect being highly significant ( P <0.001).