brevis , the statistical tests (Pearson’s Chi-squared and Fisher’s Exact) yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.001), indicating a strong and consistent association between larval presence in the soil cores and trap captures.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Ascophyllum nodosum exerts a highly significant negative effect on RKN (Hedges d = -0.362, CI = (-0.515 - -0.21) P < 0.001, n = 65).
Statistical analysis revealed a non-significant t-value of 0.660 for the ODI pre-surgery comparison ( P =0.509), but highly significant t-values of 30.000 for ODI post-surgery ( P =0.001), 1.843 for JOA pre-surgery ( P =0.066), and 25.620 for JOA post-surgery ( P =0.001), showing the effectiveness of the surgical intervention in the research group.
Overall models were highly significant ( p < .001) and indicated individual responses on included SWA indexes generated overall classification accuracy rates that exceeded chance levels, particularly for the identification of arthritis subgroup membership (see Table 4 ).
On the other hand, the 1000 μM of SNP caused a highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in viability on days 5, 10, 15, and 21, as compared with the control ( Fig. 1 ).
Both TE and the Modified ICPBL test showed highly significant discrepancies in the DA group compared to the control group ( p < 0.001).
At 12 and 24 months, this was highly significant for both scores ( P < .001) based on the pre-operative value.
Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium and Linkage Disequilibrium Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium tests revealed widespread and highly significant deviations ( p < 0.001) at all five SSR loci across the eight L. hatsudake populations ( Figure 2 ).
The median response time (on different tests) during hyponatremia was 672 ± 182 msec, and after the normalization of serum sodium it was 615 ± 184 msec, with a highly significant difference of 58 msec ( p < 0.001).
The final model was highly significant, with a R 2 value of 0.89 ( F (5) = 27.9, P < 0.001), and the model formulated was: Sand fly density = 2.9 × THF + 1.5 × TW + 2.1 × DS + 1.3 × ISV + 1.7 × IRSs - 13.0 TR was deselected in the final model for its least significance ( P = 0.46) with other explanatory variables.
Week number is highly significant ( p -value < 0.001), and the negative coefficients indicate that as the study progressed, participants were more likely to have exercise relapses.
As expected, in control animals, the peak theta-band frequency (6–12 Hz) showed highly significant positive linear correlations with running speed in both the HPC (estimate: 0.03 ± 0.00 Hz/(cm/s), t (7) = 10.95, p < 0.001; Fig. 4 A ) and RSC (estimate: 0.03 ± 0.00 Hz/(cm/s), t (7) = 11.42, p < 0.001; Fig. 4 D ).
The constant (B = -3.522) was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating a strong baseline effect.
Highly significant inverse correlations were observed between L1-4 spine BMD values and age, serum OC, ucOC, and ALP values (r=-0.425, P <0.001; r=-0.431, P <0.001; r=-0.349, P =0.001; and r=-0.393, P <0.001, respectively).
The increase in incidence rate among women was highly significant when comparing the three age groups (p < 0.001).
Regarding other sources of information, it was found that attending hands-on workshops/courses, gaining knowledge from social media, and sharing knowledge with colleagues had a highly significant effect on increasing knowledge (B = 2.27, p = 0.001; B = 2.34, p = 0.000; B = 1.32, p = 0.019).
The statistical evaluation of the results for all genogroups showed highly significant agreement between PCRs I and III ( p ≤ 0.001, κ = 0.732).
Regression analysis of age with wasting, stunting, muscle loss The ordinal multicategory logistic regression analysis indicated a highly significant relationship between age and wasting and stunting in TDT children (both p < 0.001), as outlined in Table 2 .
5 , GABA+/Cr level in the anterior reading system has a strong relationship with real word reading (R 2 = 0.25, p = 0.02), and the L-FG to L-IFG connection strength also exhibits a highly significant relationship with real word reading (R 2 = 0.47, p = 0.001).
Depending on the sample number ( n ), statistical test were done using either the Student’s t test with bilateral distribution and equal variance (results were considered significant for p <0.05 and labeled with *), or the Mann-Whitney rank sum test (results were considered statistically highly significant when p <0,001 (***); significant when p <0,01 (**); marginally significant when p <0,05.
Notably, although mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use were highly significant in univariate analysis ( P < 0.001), they were not retained in the final model after stepwise regression, likely due to their collinearity with severity scores.
Being a low educated mother carried a highly significant risk (P < 0.001) of having a below average infant 2.01 times more than a highly educated mother (OR = 2.01).
The difference between percent co-localization of UV-DDB at telomeres in control cells (1.3 ± 0.16 %) versus that in cells treated with dye plus light (19.6 ± 2.24 %) was highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Fig. 4f ).
The full model was highly significant (F 12.612 = 28.565, p < 0.001; with an R 2 = 0.36).
Welch ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among isolates for both conidial length (F = 41, p < 0.001) and width (F = 41, p < 0.001), indicating substantial variation in conidial size among individual isolates.