Barely Significant
← all phrases

highly significant

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 156,979 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This correlation was highly significant ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), indicating that the observed similarity is unlikely to occur by chance. 2.4 Expression of PAMPs and DAMPs in Human and Murine pDCs Quantitative proteomic comparison of human and murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) revealed selective, pathway‐specific differences rather than global proteome shifts.
highly significantp < 2.2e‐160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pearson correlation analysis of these whole‐sample average expression profiles revealed highly significant correlations between replicates (Peach: r = 0.94, p < 2.2e‐16; Nectarine: r = 0.91, p < 2.2e‐16), with LOESS regression confirming the linear relationship (Figure S15A ).
highly significantp<2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Lastly, we compared the average TE ages between SUO and SLO genes in human and revealed a highly significant difference (p<2.2e-16, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test), with the former at 16.1% and the latter at 21.3% sequence divergence from their consensus sequences (For reference, 16–18% of unconstrained nucleotides have been substituted since the split of primates from other mammalian orders [32] ).
highly significantp value <2.2E16the decimal point is missing; read as 2.2e-16qualifiedgold
Interestingly, we have observed a much higher number of negatively correlated mRNAs than positively correlated ones with the medians of 430 and 1,022 for the positively and negatively co-expressed transcripts respectively, and the trend towards negative correlation was highly significant ( p value <2.2E16, Wilcoxon signed rank test) (Fig. 2 e, Additional file 1 : Supplemental Table S4).
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
andersonii (tested via independent samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test), while its F is value was also significantly lower ( P < 0.05).Furthermore, verification of Rarefied Allelic Richness (Ar) via the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test revealed a highly significant difference between the two species (chi-squared = 1770.3, df = 1, P < 2.2e-16), confirming that the genetic diversity of B. andersonii is robustly higher than that of B. tianguii even after standardizing sample sizes ( Figure 3 ). 3.3.
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
IAPs are specific targets of Dnmt1’s de novo activity Next, we compared the DMR distribution over genomic features and found a highly significant enrichment at LTRs, which is independent of regional CpG density ( P < 2.2 × 10 −16 , Wilcoxon test, DMRs compared with CRs; Fig. 2e and Extended Data Fig. 2b ).
Dnmt1 has de novo activity targeted to transposable elements.
Nat Struct Mol Biol · 2021 · PMC8279952
highly significantP = 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The P2′ statistic was found to be highly significant across the 57 X substitution lines ( P = 2.2 × 10 −16 ), thus indicating that genotype has an effect on the variation seen for the proportion of progeny sired by the experimental X chromosome male when he is the second to mate.
highly significantP = 2.2E-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
DNMT1-Dependent DNA Methylation in Adult Interneurons Affects Degradative Pathways In stark contrast to the comparison of the 18 months old genotypes, we determined a highly significant overlap ( P = 2.2E-16, Fisher’s Exact test for gene set enrichment analysis; odds ratio = 0.434) of 645 genes between young control and Dnmt1 knockout interneurons, which display significant differences in both DNA methylation and gene expression ( Pensold et al., 2020 ).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 − 160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Single marker analysis revealed that NAL1 _4_31214045 had a highly significant association with tiller number ( p < 2.2 × 10 − 16 ) and explained 22.07% of the phenotypic variance (PVE), while OFP19 _5_15069810 showed a weaker but still significant association ( p = 1.99 × 10 − 5 ), with a PVE of 3.65% (Table 5 ; Fig. 6 A, B).
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
To test this prediction, we performed DRIP-seq in ovaries dissected from adult females and found strong, highly significant correlations between the female whole fly samples and ovary samples for both nonDE and FE peaksets from the adult data (Spearman’s rho > = 0.72 and P < 2.2e-16 in all comparisons, S2D Fig ).
highly significantP < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For all three species comparisons, a linear regression of %ID and log 2 hybridization ratio showed a strong and highly significant correlation ( D. sechellia : Multiple R 2 = 0.3257, P < 2.2e-16; D. simulans : Multiple R 2 = 0.2920, P < 2.2e-16; D. yakuba : Multiple R 2 = 0.4083, P < 2.2e-16) (Figure 2 ), with the data for D. yakuba showing the strongest correlation.