“highly significant”

The difference between the two countries in mean gene number was highly significant ( t test, p = 0.001; Table 2 ).

A one-way ANOVA test, also known as statistical analysis or technique, [ Table 2 ] was performed between each group for all sealers and was found to be very highly significant ( P < 0.001) with AH Plus ® , highly significant ( P = 0.022) with GuttaFlow, and showed no significant difference statistically ( P = 0.937) with Epiphany while comparing under moisture conditions.

The results of the included studies showed highly significant heterogeneity (I 2 =98.5%; p<0.001).

The pattern of the nMDS was confirmed by a one-way PERMANOVA with factor nematode species ( Table S3 ), which was highly significant ( df = 8, Pseudo-F = 16, p = 0.001; but note a significant PERMDISP ( p < 0.05)) and exhibited significant pairwise differences ( p < 0.05) among all pairs of species.

In stage 1 to 2 group, it was 3.7 ± 1.5 ng/mL, in stage 3 to 4, it was 10.10 ± 1.22 ng/mL, and in stage 5 group, it was 12.34 ± 0.88 ng/mL; the difference between the 3 groups was highly significant ( P < .001).

The value of the LDH is higher in Hegazi (588.71 ± 188.87 U/l) than those of the Shami breed (261.66 ± 20.98 U/l) and this difference is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

34 By logistic regression analysis, the relationship between randomly assigned MPA AUCt 0-12 and rejection was highly significant ( P < 0.001). 26 Increasing MPA AUCt 0-12 was associated with a reduction in the probability of BPAR by 50%, 75%, and 90% at MPA AUCt 0-12 values of 15, 25, and 40 mg/L.h, respectively. 26 The association between rejection and trough MPA total concentration was also significant, though weaker ( P < 0.01).

In contrast to previous studies, 3 , 38 , 39 only a moderate but highly significant ( P <0.001) correlation between RV EF and LV EF was observed in our study (ρ=0.41 versus ρ=0.58 in Geva et al 38 ).

The difference was already highly significant at day 30, becoming progressively more accentuated over the study period ( p < 0.001 for all internal comparisons).

However, there was a highly significant difference in the rejection rates between nests with only real white eggs and nests with white or blue model eggs added ( χ 2 =38.176, df =2, P <0.001).

russeli were highly significant for the full dataset before (CR = 0.621, P < 0.001) and after (CR = 0.519, P < 0.001) allometric correction and with the landmark-only dataset before (CR = 0.851, P < 0.001) and after allometric correction (CR = 0.738, P < 0.001).

Only for medial and combined defect localization versus lateral localization was a highly significant effect identified (p<0.001) [ 45 ].

In addition, the upward and downward data were tested to determine whether they had a mean orientation along the 90° to 270° axis (i.e., Kuiper's v test with an a priori mean direction of 90°) with both results highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This two-way interaction between intersection configuration and scan direction was highly significant ( F (2,225) = 104.14, P < 0.001).

The difference in means was compared using Student's t -test and the results were highly significant with P < 0.001.

The log-rank test indicates a highly significant result, with p < 0.001.

Predictors that were selected consistently [at least weakly significant ( p < 0.05) in two out of three selection processes and at least highly significant ( p < 0.001) in one] were used for consecutive analyses.

There was a highly significant association ( p < .001) between incidence of VLBW and BMI category.

The difference between the groups was highly significant ( p < .001; Table 2 ).

Results and Conclusion: The result showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in all ten life skill domains such as decision-making, problem-solving, empathy, self-awareness, communication skill, interpersonal relationship skill, coping with emotions, coping with stress, creative thinking skill, and critical thinking skill between the TM practitioners and non-TM practitioners.

Though the effect size for first-day closed ICP was modest (hazard ratio = 1.034), its association with mortality risk was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

time perspective decision-making competence decision making working memory older adults Vetenskapsrådet 10.13039/501100004359 Present Fatalistic was a highly significant predictor of DMC (β = -0.33, p < 0.001).

Results Results indicated a highly significant change in maximal possible wearing duration among the EEG devices (χ 2 6 =40.2, n=24; P <.001).

Within-group analyses of the SCAS reports from pre to 12-month follow-up (see Fig 4 and Table 4 ) revealed large and highly significant improvements for all responders (adolescents: d = .99, p < .001; mothers: d = 1.10, p < .001; and fathers: d = .94, p < .001).

To delve deeper, we conducted ANOVA, which showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).