“highly significant”

Clutch size and nestling survival in non-predated clutches Laying date of the first egg had a highly significant negative effect on clutch size (model #4: − 0.178 ± 0.014 SE, t = − 12.8, n = 736, p < 0.001).

The probability ( p ) value was considered significant at a level < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.001.

The cell attachment and cell proliferation were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001*, *signifies result is significant) compared to the machined titanium surfaces with an effect size of 59%.

In Student’s t-test both correlations were highly significant (p<0.001).

The difference in response to permethrin exposure between blood-fed and unfed cohorts from the Fumoz-R strain was highly significant (p < 0.001) with the blood-fed cohorts showing a mean percentage mortality approximately five times lower than that of the unfed cohorts (Table 1 ).

The effect of study year on CPXV seroprevalence (by χ2/d.f.) was highly significant (χ 2 2 31.2; p<0.001); seroprevalence was 2.7 times higher among bank voles sampled in 2010 (36.1% [95% CI 31.7%–40.7%]) than in 2002 (13.1% [7.4%–21.0%]).

Nonetheless, chimeras Du-He3 and Du-He4, but not Du-He2, were poorly infectious for PDH; these in vitro data, performed on the same batch of PDH for the different viruses and reproduced several times, are statistically highly significant (P<0.001, Student's t-test).

For example, 110 genes showed a highly significant change at p < 0.001 (see Additional file 1 ).

In Table 4 , in the comparison group between orthodontists and general dentists, male and female photographs with 0°, 1°, and 2° were statistically not significant ( P > 0.05), whereas alterations with 3°, 4°, 5°, and 6° were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The Phase III studies reported a modest, but highly significant ( P <0.001) mean absolute improvement in FEV1% of 2.6–4.0% compared to placebo at 24 weeks.

Comparing the distance between sulci alares nasi at the transition point to the philtrum (P5–P6), a highly significant difference could be found when comparing the groups ( p < 0.001).

4 A) revealed a highly significant effect ( F 1,45 = 15.2, p < 0.001) of repeated measures (i.e., a statistically significant increase in grimacing on day 1; 18–36 h post–surgery) but no ZT group × repeated measures interaction ( F 3,45 = 0.05, p = 0.99).

The significance level for the calculations was set as follows: significant, p ≤ 0.05; very significant, p ≤ 0.01; and highly significant, p ≤ 0.001, using the normal distribution of the variables.

Plain language summary: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmcn.16268 Proveca Ltd In participants initially on placebo who switched to 320 μg/mL glycopyrronium for the OLSE, the median change in total DIS score between day 84 and day 252 of −18 points was highly significant (−44, −5; p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).

Interaction analyses In the logistic regression modelling, we found highly significant ( p <0.001) additive gene effects for the LOC387715 and CFH loci, both having approximately the same effect size ( Table 3 ).

We compared the rank order of enhancers from cells with a single barcode detected to cells with >1 barcodes detected and found a highly significant agreement in rank order of enhancers (Kendall’s rank correlation test, τ = 0.909, p < 0.001).

In contrast, a highly significant (P < 0.001) approximately threefold difference was found in the percentage of total cytokine-secreting Ad5-specific CD8 T cells stimulated with Ad5 IC–treated DCs compared with Ad5 vector–treated DCs ( Fig. 4 a ).

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirms highly significant differences ( p <0.001) between ImpAO and other algorithms.

Although no significant difference of CCD counts between the acupuncture and control groups was found ( P = 0.325), a highly significant positive effect of acupuncture was detected in center B ( P < 0.001).

Results There was a statistically very highly significant increase ( p <0.001) in serum TSLP levels among the case group (1042.7±812.93) compared to the control group (314.21±220.78).

Persistent LTP (>25 h) induced by HFS (200 Hz) was highly significant compared with rats that received pp test‐pulse stimulation only (Figs. 4 A,B,D) (PS: F (1,10) = 22.5, P < 0.001; fEPSP: F (1,10) = 26.6, P < 0.001; both groups n = 6).

Analysis of the intrinsic reactivity of the MWCNT preparations by EPR showed a highly significant generation of free radicals by all of the materials ( P < 0.001 vs. vehicle control) which was significantly reduced by freeze granulation although still remained very high.

The proof of concept analysis and the main variability factors for LSM and FT were highly significant at a P value (P<0.001) lower than the scheduled P value of 0.01 and obtained with at least three different methods.

The increase in fruit weight was highly significant ( p < 0.001) during fruit ripening of all cultivars.

As for maximum biosurfactant productivity, Y 2 , which indicates the effectiveness of the microbe to produce high concentrations of biosurfactant in the shortest period of time, proved that the quadratic model was highly significant ( p = 0.001) in which there was only a 0.01% probability that such a large model F value could be generated due to noise ( supplementary data: Table S2 ).