Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
It can be seen by comparing corresponding cells in Table 4 that, even when the hair stage effect is highly significant (e.g. total pRb – P <0.001 for stage difference), the improvement in intrasubject CV due to the stage adjustment is modest, with a greater impact on intersubject CV, perhaps reflecting a greater variation in the distribution of stages between subjects.
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding elongation at break, higher values were obtained for non-crosslinked scaffolds versus crosslinked scaffolds and weaker values obtained for the collagen reference compared to coll/chit blends in general were shown to be statistically highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a significant effect of treatment ( F 2,234 = 4.78, p = 0.139) and an interaction of treatment and time ( F 12,234 = 3.67, p < 0.0001) and Bonferroni post hoc comparison showed a highly significant difference between ME7 + LPS + IL-1RA and ME7 + LPS + veh at 5 h ( p < 0.001).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results and discussion Cold acclimation and FLN Analysis of variance for final leaf number (FLN) and LT 50 showed that genotype, acclimation period, and the genotype×acclimation period interaction were highly significant ( P <0.001) for both variables indicating that there were important genotypic differences in the magnitude and patterns of the LT responses.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ToM Battery-vf score varied according to age, presenting a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and significant differences between the age groups (3, 4, 5, and 6 years), as measured by the ANOVA ( F (3, 207) = 8.794, p < 0.001) and Bonferroni multiple comparisons.
highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Pairwise comparisons between groups showed there were highly significant differences in beta diversity between M1 and M2 (Adonis, R 2 = 0.186, P = 0.001), M1 and F1 (Adonis, R 2 = 0.097, P = 0.001), and F1 and F2 (Adonis, R 2 = 0.070, P = 0.001, Fig. 2B ), while there was no significant difference in beta diversity between female and male ticks collected in the fall (Adonis, R 2 = 0.023, P = 0.379, Fig. 2B ).