“highly significant”

Differences in the distribution of functional assay scores across all three variant groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

non-diabetic PC scores were highly significant (P<0.001 for both PC2 and PC3)(data not shown).

Despite the generally low levels of genetic differentiation, the populations exhibit a highly significant signal of isolation-by-distance (Mantel test r = 0.79, p < 0.001) which becomes especially apparent due to the large geographical extent of our sampling (Fig. 2d ).

The highly significant positive correlations ( P < 0.001) to DOM, BP-S, HL-S, and LM-S might indicate that this understudied clade also encodes capabilities of organic carbon usage, as in the aforementioned NP clades.

From Table 10 , it can be observed that the difference among the 10 features of all three time-series matrices under two different EMF exposures is highly significant ( p <0.001), indicating that the differences in the selected time-series features of the zebrafish locomotion are important for the EMF exposure in this study.

This difference was statistically highly significant (t = 6.984, P < .001), as shown in Figure 3 .

Assessing the association of individual metabolites of these factors with TJA revealed a highly significant association between Fatty Acid Chain Length (FALen) and Any OA or TJA (P < 0.001).

The F-statistic was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the overall model was statistically significant in predicting CD4+ count on ART.

Statistical significance is reported by the P -value of the statistical test procedures and was assessed as significant (* P < 0.05), strongly significant (** P < 0.01) or highly significant (*** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001).

We found no significant increase in fat mass (SMD 0.24; 95% CI − 0.19 to 0.66; P = 0.272), likely because of the overall short period of observation (mean 6 months; range 1–6), which probably did not allow the detection of substantial changes, with highly significant heterogeneity between studies ( I 2 = 81.97; P = 0.001).

In addition, we found a highly significant decrease in BV/TV in the primary spongiosa of Lmna G609G/G609G bones compared to Lmna +/+ at both ages (-23%, p=0.001 and -38%, p=0.002, respectively) confirming the optical assessment of a thinner hypertrophic zone in few animals ( Supplementary Fig 4 ).

Effect of Treatment with HSD and/or PbAc on Body Weight (BW) Gain, as Well as Epididymal and Testicular Weights The obtained results showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in final body weights (F.

This was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that larger values of the three parameters are significantly associated with SMR.

The difference in the rate of viral coinfections was highly significant ( p < 0.001, t test). 3.2.

There was, however, a highly significant main effect of the saccadic go-signal delay duration (F(1.29,10.30) = 38.07, p < 0.001, Greenhouse Geisser corrected), demonstrating that the proportion of target saccades generally increased with prolonged movement preparation time.

2 I) with the area fraction of active caspase 3 immunopositivity being highly significant in the LP+Poly I:C+LPS group in the hippocampal regions (CA1, CA3 and DG) when compared with HP control [ F (7,856) =7.68, P ≤0.001; F (7,856) =13.97, P ≤0.001; F (7,856) =25.92, P ≤0.001, group wise interaction] and LP alone group [ F (3,428) =6.92, P ≤0.001; F (3,428) =5.3, P =0.001; F (3,428) =20.86, P ≤0.001, interaction within treatments].

This study showed several PWF parameters had a p value of < 0.05, and further demonstrated a highly significant effect ( p < 0.001).

Logistic regression analysis revealed that OI on day 3 had highly significant prognostic value for mortality (odds ratio, 256.5, 95% CI 27.1–2424, p<0.001), with an AUC of 0.919 (cut-off value, 17; positive predictive value, 0.905; negative predictive value, 0.964; p=0.0001).

The multivariate multiple regression analysis showed highly significant association (overall p<0.001) of the LDD and its structural components with age, lumbar spine BMD (as well as with hip BMD, not shown), body weight and exercise.

In the present study, the trend of association between 25(OH) and LDL cholesterol was reverse and highly significant (β=−1.5; P=<0.001).

Measurements were deemed significant when * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 and highly significant when *** P < 0.001.

Noninvasive and invasive measures of rCBF were strongly correlated ( R 2 = 0.84) during asphyxia with a highly significant slope effect of 1.3 (95% CI = 1.16–1.45, p < 0.001).

The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.852, 0.650, and 0.987, with a highly significant associated p<0.001, significantly associated p<0.01 and a highly significantly associated p<0.001 for IL-6, resistin and NT-proBNP, respectively ( figure 3 ).

In particular, for the comparisons between gender minority adults assigned female at birth and control females, all the effects concerning AQ, SQ, and EQ scores were moderate to large (Cohen’s d = 0.47 to 1.24) and highly significant (all p values < 0.001).

Regression identified Head–neck Connection, Quality of Legs, Walk length of Stride, and Scope as highly significant predictors of sales price ( p < 0.001), with Length of Croup, Trot Elasticity, Trot Balance, and Take-off Direction also significant ( p < 0.05).