“highly significant”

The difference between the cases and controls, for hemolysin production, was highly significant ( P <0.001).

Women with a family history of panic attacks were over three times more likely to experience such episodes with a highly significant P value ( P < 0.001), indicating a strong familial link to panic attacks [ Tables 5 and 6 ].

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that the three-factor model fit the data significantly better than the one-factor model.

Not surprisingly, at 72 h, IR alone yielded a highly significant decrease in cell viability in infected T-cells, which was enhanced at 120 h (lane 1; p -value ≤ 0.001).

No significant differences between temperature, pH, or turbidity were observed between the two lakes over the study period ( p > 0.05); however, significant and highly significant differences between the two lakes across the sampling period were observed for dissolved oxygen ( p < 0.001), chlorophyll a and b levels ( p < 0.01, p < 0.001), and carotenoids ( p < 0.001) with dissolved oxygen demonstrating the most difference between lakes. 2.3.

This immunoreactivity became intense and widespread across the COVID-19 infected group, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) compared with the control group (Fig. 11 b).

Globally, the correlations were strong and highly significant for female dementia prevalence ( r = 0.852, p < 0.001) and sex disparity ( r = 0.795, p < 0.001) (Table 4 ), indicating that a higher age at first childbirth is associated with higher dementia prevalence and greater sex disparity.

The enrichment of AluY is highly significant (p < 0.001) based on simulation.

The data showed that the correlation of this trait reached highly significant level (p<0.001) among all environmental points.

After 5,000 bootstrap resamples, the regression coefficients for the paths from PL to TSC (0.413) and from TSC to WSB (0.473) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In contrast, these delta-scores were negative and highly significant for both the rBPD (−0.63 ± 0.53, t (25) = 5.58, p < 0.001) and cBPD (−0.33 ± 0.36, t (21) = −4.62, p < 0.001) groups.

The highest F ST value was observed between the Dzungarian and the southeastern Gobi ( F ST = 0.0191), the lowest between the Transaltai and the southeastern Gobi ( F ST = 0.0068), and an intermediate between the Dzungarian and the Transaltai Gobi ( F ST = 0.0088; all pairwise F ST values were highly significant at P < 0.001).

The main effect of type was highly significant, F (3.26,143.56) = 24.4, p < 0.001, GES = 0.201.

The difference in HbA 1c reduction was highly significant ( P < 0.001) between G1 and G2 (0.67% [0.35–0.99]) or G3 (0.91% [0.60–1.21]), but not between G2 and G3 ( Fig. 2 B and Supplementary Table 2 ).

The average weight in the normal group was 56.4 kg, while in the obese group, it was 92.0 kg, demonstrating a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

For the whole CST, there was a highly significant negative correlation between disease stage and ADC (-0.84; p < 0,001), while a statistically non-significant correlation of 0.48 (p = 0.095) was seen for FA values.

In the case of each debate, the difference in assessment between the two groups of supporters was highly significant (χ 2 = 255.52, P < 0.001; χ 2 = 257.28, P < 0.001, respectively), and both groups differed from undecided voters (all χ 2 s > 19.84, P s < 0.001).

There was no significant correlation found between cases and searches at day 7 ( P = 0.178) but highly significant, strong correlations at days 12 ( r = 0.978, P ≤ 0.001) and nineteen ( r = 0.973, P ≤ 0.001).

All sources of variation were highly significant ( P<0.001 ) and more than 95% of the variance was explained by differences within the A, B and D genomes, whereas only a small part of the overall variance (less than 5%) could be attributed to differences between landraces and modern varieties.

The correlation coefficient between growth of new cases and Google search interest (past 7 days) is highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001).

In addition, results highlight that past exposure to risk while travelling is a highly significant factor distinguishing the tourist segments ( p = 0.001).

Despite the protein-coding region evolving under an overall conservative tendency, the likelihood ratio test comparing the likelihood scores of site models M7 (beta) and M8 (beta + ω > 1) yielded a test statistic of LRT = 40.34, which is highly significant under a chi-squared distribution with 2 degrees of freedom (critical value = 13.82, p < 0.001).

Mean values of fp and Ap (Figure 7B and 7D ) presented highly significant increases during fatigue (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively).

aeruginosa early biofilm at 470 μF capacitance at 4°C and 25°C and at three different irradiation frequencies of 540, 720, and 900 was highly significant compared to the control, with a bactericidal rate of >80% ( p < 0.001).

Figure 2 shows the highly significant main effect of ROI ( F (2, 481) = 547.49, p < .001), with highest responses in the MO region and lowest responses in the LOT region ( t (481) LOT‐MO = −30.98, t (480) LOT‐ROT = −5.26, t (481) ROT‐MO = −25.76, all p Bonferroni < .001).