“highly significant”

On all four dimensions of our self-developed rating scale, there were highly significant main effects of Time (Physical: F (1, 12) = 69.06, p < .001, η p 2 =.852; Mental: F (1, 12) = 18.83, p < .001, η p 2 =.611; Emotional: F (1, 12) = 25.41, p < .001, η p 2 =.679; Social: F (1, 12) = 15.15, p < .002, η p 2 =.558).

p < 0.05 (*) was considered as statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) as highly significant, p < 0.001 (***) and p < 0.0001 (****) as extremely significant, and ns as not significant.

Clinical T stage, grade, presenting PSA, and pre-radiation PSA were all highly significant ( P <0.001) predictors of PSA failure on univariate analysis ( Table 2 ).

In addition, Bartlett’s test of sphericity with a chi-square value of 57.422 ( df = 1) was highly significant at p < 0.001, indicating that there were adequate relationships between the ESs provisioning variables included in the analysis (Field 2005).

Statistical significance was represented as follows: significant differences (* p < 0.05), very significant differences (** p < 0.01), and highly significant differences (*** p < 0.001). 3.

The results of the MANOVA ( Table 1 ) showed a highly significant effect of the interaction variety × fruit ripening ( p < 0.001) on the three sets of variables.

These degenerative changes were marked by highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in tubular and luminal diameters of seminiferous tubule and epithelial height among bisphenols treated groups as compared to control.

In the test group, a highly significant reduction in the baseline Ct values of each bacterial species was observed within the first month following AFS ( p < 0.001 for all species, Table 2 ).

MVC, analyzed as a dichotomous variable (using the median value of 59 microvessels as the cut-off point), was a highly significant predictor of both overall survival ( Table 1 ; P =0.001) and of disease-free survival (data not shown).

The expected main effect of Orienting was highly significant, F (2, 44) = 153.27, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.87.

Correlation was considered to be significant with p < 0.05 and highly significant with p ≤ 0.001.

The association between each of the cytological grading systems and the histological grading was found to be highly significant with a P value of <0.001, as measured by the Chi-square test.

For patients who developed cardiotoxicity, the fall in left ventricular ejection fraction after a cumulative doxorubicin dose of only 200 mg m −2 was highly significant (left ventricular ejection fraction 49.7±1.8%, P =0.001 vs baseline).

All treatment groups prolonged survival time significantly compared to the negative controls, with the standard exhibiting a highly significant prolongation ( p < 0.001) than the extract (Table 5 ).

As there was increase in the duration of diabetes, the PN was shown to be increased, and it is statistically highly significant with the P < 0.001 with the odds ratio of 0.23 (95% CI 0.13–0.39).

Both these differences were highly significant ( P <0.001 for both percentage positive cells and MRFI values).

The expression level of one gene, oxysterol binding protein-like 11 (OSBPL11), was revealed to be lower in HCC tissues compared with adjacent tissues in all 10 samples; this difference was identified to be significant in nine of the samples, and the difference between the HCT and AT groups reached a highly significant level (P<0.001; Table SIII ).

The difference in IL-1β expression levels between the two groups is highly significant, with a p value < 0.001.

However, a highly significant interaction was observed between MedDietScore and IBI on 10-year diabetes risk (p < 0.001).

However, since the association between serological clusters and disease severity remained highly significant (P < 0.001) after excluding data from the 2008 samples, this confounding was not responsible for the association, as might be the case, for example, if the frequency of severe malaria-causing genotypes in the population changed from year to year.

The Closeness rate was related to the type of human-robot interactions with a highly significant increase of IOS score in Correlated as compared to Static state (p < 0.001).

Meanwhile, one-way ANOSIM also revealed a highly significant effect of sampling site (Global test R = 0.448, P = 0.001) based on fish abundance data.

Following the post hoc screening, the following degrees of significance were established: not significant ( p > 0.05), significant ( p ≤ 0.05), very significant ( p ≤ 0.01), and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

CFA confirmed the EFA-derived two-factor structure as all the regression weights obtained exhibited positive and highly significant ones (all above 0.4) and highly satisfactory fit indexes, including Chi-square = 119.12, P < 0.001, TLI = 0.914, CFI = 0.922, GFI = 0.915, NFI = 0.832, IFI = 0.929, RFI = 0.887, RMR = 0.066, and RMSEA = 0.043.

This correlation (Kendall's T=0.192), although highly significant ( P <0.001), was rather weak; just for a comparison, the correlation between depth of tumour invasion and positive nodes presented a Kendall's T of 0.525.